RAO Bulletin Update
15 June 2008
Note: Anyone receiving this who does not want it request click on the
automatic delete tab at the end of the Bulletin or hit reply and place
the word "Remove" in the subject line!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THIS BULLETIN CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES
== Medicare Reimbursement Rates 2008 [02] ------ (18 Days Left)
== VA Report Card ------------------------------------- (High Marks)
== Medicare Fraud [07] ------------------------------- ($205 million)
== Mobilized Reserve 11 JUN 08 ---------------- (16,250 Increase)
== Tricare Prior Authorization --------------------- (Requirements)
== VA Home Loan [12] --------------------- (Mortgage Assistance)
== Windows Vista [05] --------- (Performance Impacts Revenues)
== NDAA 2009 [04] ---------------------------- (Steps to Complete)
== Social Security Debit Card --------------- (Initiated Spring 08)
== VA Blue Water Claims [03] ----------------------------- (Denied)
== VA Ombudsman's Office ------------------------------ (H.R.2192)
== Tricare Fees Overseas ------------------------------ (Action Alert)
== TERA [01] -------------------------- (58,000 Retirees)
== SSA Prisoner Rules [01] ---------------- (What is not Available)
== Expatriate Income Tax [01] -------------------------- (Deadlines)
== IRS Statute of Limitations ---------- (Expat False Assumptions)
== Tax on Negotiated Balances ---------------------- (Credit Cards)
== Shad [06] ------------------------------ (H.R.5954 Hearings)
== VA Lawsuit (Lack of Care) [08] --------- (Perez’s PTSD email)
== Tricare Gray Area Retiree Bill ------------------------ (H.R.6185)
== Fisher House Expansion [03] ------------------- (Boost 38 to 62)
== Veteran Rural Health Advisory Committee ------ (Appointees)
== WI Vet Educational Benefits -------------------------- (Overview)
== PTSD [21] -------------------------- (VA Denies Money a Factor)
== CT Vet Educational Benefits -------------------------- (Overview)
== Walter Reed Data Breach ---------- (Gov’t Breaches Continue)
== U of U Hospital Data Breach ------------- (2.2 million @ Risk)
== Bank of NY Data Breach] ------------------ (4.5 million @ Risk)
== Alzheimer’s [04] ------------------ (7 Stages)
== VA PTSD Claim Support [01] ------------ (Stressor Symptoms)
== Medicare Fraud [06] ------------------------ ($638 million in FL)
== National Monuments --------------- (Pearl Harbor Considered)
== Veteran Legislation Status 13 JUN 08 ------ (Where we Stand)
MEDICARE REIMBURSEMENT RATES 2008 UPDATE 02: The cut in Medicare
payments to physicians that are scheduled to take place on 1 JUL. Unless
legislation is passed before then, there will be a cut of 10% in Medicare
physician payments. This is very important for military retirees
because Tricare payments to physicians are the same as the Medicare
payments.
There is great concern that if the payments cuts are not reversed
doctors will not take any new Medicare patients, and likely no new Tricare
patients. On 12 June, by a vote of 54 yea (58%, 60% required for
passage), 39 nay 7 not voting, the Senate failed to pass S.3101, the
Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008, which would
have
cancelled the 10% cuts in physician reimbursements and provided a 1%
increase to those reimbursements. Inexplicably, Sen. Harry Reid switched
his vote from Yea to Nay. Also, very interesting is that the three
contenders for the Presidency: Sen. John McCain, Sen. Hillary Clinton, and
Sen. Barack Obama did not vote on this important issue.
As always seems to be the case, the battle is over
where to find
the money to pay for the reversal of the cuts, since the Medicare (and
military health care) budget for FY2008 was predicated on the cuts going
into effect. Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) has
come up with a bill that would stop the cuts by replacing them with a
0.5% increase in physician payments this year and an additional 1.1%
increase in FY 2009. His bill would also improve Medicare benefits by
expanding subsidies for low-income people, reducing co-payments for mental
health treatment and increasing coverage for preventive health
services. However, his bill is opposed by most Republicans because it
would be
paid for by cutting costs in privately run Medicare Advantage programs
that have been championed by GOP lawmakers and President Bush. Senator
Charles Grassley (R-IA), ranking member of the Senate Finance
Committee, has drafted his own bill to fix the problem. The Grassley bill
would
give doctors the same increases as the Baucus bill, but would pay for
them differently. Grassley’s bill would eliminate bonus payments that
some Medicare Advantage plans receive for operating in areas with
teaching hospitals, a provision also contained in the Baucus bill. But
Grassley would provide additional money by making cuts in some Medicaid
provisions. Medicaid is the federal government health program for the
poor.
Both sides agree that fixing the pending cuts is the biggest health care
priority they face this year, but they are running out of time to fix
it.
To see how your Senator voted on this legislation refer
to
http://tinyurl.com/3z2yee. After checking, you are encouraged to call
and thank those who voted “Yea” and to ask why those who voted “Nay”
did so. Calling your congressional representative in Washington D.C. is
easier than you think. Our government and the AMA have provided the
following no charge numbers for constituents to talk to their elected
official’s offices located in the Capital Building:
• 1-866-272-6622 Capital Operator Direct
• 1-800-833-6354 AMA Grass Roots Hotline - follow prompts
• 1-800-828-0498 Capital Operator Direct
• 1-800-833-6354 AMA Grass Roots Hotline – follow prompts
• 1-866-340-9281 Capital Operator Direct
• 1-866-220-0044 Capital Operator Direct
When the capitol operator answers:
1. Tell her which Senate or House office you want.
2. When the office answers, tell the staffer that you are a constituent
and either thank the Senator for his Yea vote or ask why the Senator
voted Nay. If Senator Reid's office, ask why he switched his vote from
Yea to Nay.
3. Provide additional information requested by the staffer. Usually
your zip code to confirm you are a constituent.
4. Be polite and courteous, remember the staffer is simply the
"messenger".
5. For a listing of all other bills refer to
http://thomas.loc.gov.
[Source: TROA Washington Update & USDR Action alert 13 Jun 08 ++]
VA REPORT CARD: A new “hospital report card” by the Department of
Veterans Affairs (VA) gives the Department’s health care system high
marks, with VA facilities often outscoring private-sector health plans in
standards commonly accepted by the health care industry. Among the
report’s finding were:
• 98% of veterans were seen within 30 days at primary care facilities,
97% at specialty clinics. (Veterans requiring emergency care are
seen
immediately.)
• All of VA’s 153 medical centers are accredited by the independent
Joint Commission which accredits all U.S. health care facilities.
• The quality scores for older veterans are similar to those for
younger veterans.
Although screening for breast and cervical cancer for women in VA
facilities exceeds screening in private-sector facilities, women veterans
lag behind their male counterparts in some quality measurements, the
report noted. VA has already launched an aggressive program to
ensure
women veterans receive the highest quality of care, including placement of
women advocates in every outpatient clinic and medical center.
Health
care will be a major topic at VA’s National Summit on Women Veterans
Issues scheduled for 20-22 JUN in Washington. The report also found
minority veterans are generally less satisfied with inpatient and
outpatient care than white veterans. That disparity will be the
focus of an
in-depth study, based upon input from veterans, which will be completed
this summer. The report card is available on the Internet at
http://www.va.gov/health/docs/Hospital_Quality_Report.pdf.
In FEB
Congress directed VA to complete the report card, highlighting
measurements
of quality, safety, timeliness, efficiency and patient-centeredness.
James Peake, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs noted that, “No other
health care organization provides this much information about its ability
to care for its patients.” [Source: VA News Release 14 Jun 08 ++]
MEDICARE FRAUD UPDATE 07: While Congress debates whether or not to
reduce Medicare payments to practitioners, task force officials are
uncovering increased amounts of fraud. Over nearly four
years a high
school dropout named Rita Campos electronically submitted more than
140,000
Medicare claims for unnecessary equipment and services. All it took to
bilk the federal government out of $105 million was a laptop computer.
After pleading guilty to filing false claims, she has helped
authorities win indictments against more than half a dozen Florida doctors
and
patients who allegedly accepted kickbacks for pretending to receive
costly HIV drug therapy. With her cooperation, FBI agents this week
arrested
three Miami-area men who, the government alleges, financed sham
clinics that billed the government more than $100 million. Sentenced to 10
years, Campos Ramirez, 60, may yet reduce her prison term by helping
authorities unwind "the large web of medical clinics, doctors, nurses,
money laundering companies and HIV clinic financiers who participated in
this massive fraud," prosecutors wrote earlier this year in court papers.
Her lawyer did not return calls seeking comment.
By many accounts, Campos Ramirez was unusually
successful.
Prosecutors say that corrupt medical clinic owners anticipate that
Medicare
will cover a quarter of their phony claims. But Campos Ramirez persuaded
authorities to cover 60% of all the bills she submitted on behalf of 75
HIV clinics in South Florida, according to court filings. Health-care
experts say the simplicity of Ramirez's scheme underscores the scope of
the growing fraud problem and the need to devote more resources to
theft prevention. Law enforcement authorities estimate that health-care
fraud costs taxpayers more than $60 billion each year. A critical aspect
of the problem is that Medicare, the health program for the elderly and
the disabled, automatically pays the vast majority of the bills it
receives from companies that possess federally issued supplier numbers.
Computer and audit systems now in place to detect problems generally
focus on overbilling and unorthodox medical treatment rather than fraud,
scholars say.
Daniel R. Levinson, the inspector general of the
Department of
Health an Human Services (HHS) has warned repeatedly that the
Medicare
program is "highly vulnerable" to fraud, particularly in South Florida,
where schemes center on expensive, infusion-based HIV medications and on
equipment such as wheelchairs, walkers, canes and hospital beds.
Officials from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), which
oversees federally funded health programs, say they have stepped up
their efforts to combat fraud over the past year by working closely with
investigators, removing the requisite billing numbers of nearly 900
companies and imposing new standards in high-fraud areas that would
prevent
people convicted of felonies from ever receiving a Medicare number.
Investigators and prosecutors trained their focus on Miami after noticing
two troubling patterns:
• HHS investigators discovered that nearly half of 1,581 medical
equipment companies they visited in the Miami area did not comply with
basic
Medicare requirements to be open during scheduled hours and to have a
telephone number. The inspector general and the Government
Accountability Office have flagged weak oversight of these kinds of
suppliers for a
dozen years, according to congressional testimony.
• The South Florida region bills Medicare more than $2 billion each
year for injectable HIV medications. That figure is 22 times as high as
the amount of similar claims in the rest of the country, and is far out
of line with demographic data in a population of 2 million people in
Miami-Dade County.
Justice Department officials moved to freeze money in suspicious bank
accounts controlled by medical equipment company owners and they created
a Washington-based strike force to handle the issue. The strike force,
in concert with a small group of U.S. attorney's offices, has in the
past year opened nearly 900 criminal investigations and convicted 560
defendants in health-care fraud offenses throughout the country.
Authorities say the strategy is working. They point to a $1.75 billion
drop in
Medicare claims in Miami since the operation began a year ago. But even
government officials hope for a more comprehensive solution.
Christopher Dennis, the special agent in charge of the HHS inspector
general's
office in Miami, said fraudulent medical equipment companies appear to
have shifted gears since the strike force arrived. After a crackdown in
South Florida, at least some corporate owners moved to the north, he
said. Investigators dubbed one initiative "Operation Whack-a-Mole," after
the carnival game in which a creature pops up in different places
after being hit with a hammer.
The strike force recently established a base in Los Angeles,
another area rife with fraud. Prosecutors announced criminal charges last
month against two medical equipment company owners who are accused of
falsely billing Medicare more than $2 million. Plans call for a similar
rollout this fall in Houston, another potential fraud hot spot. Officials
who oversee the Medicare program say they are vigilant despite time
pressure and limited resources. Employees review fewer than 5% of the
nearly 1 billion claims filed each year. The vast majority of claims
shuttle through computer systems that are tweaked when authorities notice
fraud patterns. This year, CMS is working to finalize a rule that would
prevent convicted felons from obtaining Medicare billing numbers. At
present, that regulation applies only in a few high-fraud regions.
[Source: Washington Post Carrie Johnson article 13 Jun 08 ++]
MOBILIZED RESERVE 11 JUN 08: The Army, Air Force and Marine Corps
announced the current number of reservists on active duty as of 11 JUN 08
in support of the partial mobilization. The net collective result is
16250 more reservists mobilized than last reported in the Bulletin for 28
MAY 08. At any given time, services may mobilize some units and
individuals while demobilizing others, making it possible for these
figures to
either increase or decrease. The total number currently on active duty
in support of the partial mobilization of the Army National Guard and
Army Reserve is 87,542; Navy Reserve, 5,982; Air National Guard and Air
Force Reserve, 12,452; Marine Corps Reserve, 9,150; and the Coast
Guard Reserve, 784. This brings the total National Guard and Reserve
personnel who have been mobilized to 115,950, including both units and
individual augmentees. A cumulative roster of all National Guard and
Reserve
personnel, who are currently mobilized, can be found at
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jun2008/d20080611ngr.pdf
.. [Source:
DoD News Release 456-08 11 Jun 08 ++]
TRICARE PRIOR AUTHORIZATION: Tricare Standard puts the power to
manage your health care in your hands by not requiring referrals.
However,
some services may require prior authorization.
Under TRICARE Standard prior authorization is required for the
following services:
• Adjunctive dental services
• Home health services
• Hospice care
• Non-emergency inpatient behavioral health care, including
non-emergency inpatient admissions for substance use disorders
• Outpatient behavioral health care after the eighth visit in a fiscal
year (Oct. 1–Sept. 30)
• Transplants (solid organ and stem cell)
• Tricare Extended Care Health Option services
Your network provider can coordinate the authorization with the
regional Tricare contractor. Once an authorization is granted, the
contractor
will also issue service beginning and ending dates for medical or
surgical services. For behavioral health authorizations, the
contractor
will specify a certain number of visits, in addition to the beginning and
ending dates. All authorized care must be received before the
authorization's end date. If not, your provider must acquire a new
authorization. Additional authorization rules may apply, so it's
best to call
your regional Tricare contractor if you have questions. [Source:
NAUS
Weekly Update 13 Jun 08 ++]
VA HOME LOAN UPDATE 12: Many home owners have found it difficult
recently to pay their mortgages, VA guaranteed or otherwise, but
intervention by loan counselors at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
has
actually reduced the number of veterans defaulting on their home loans.
Accounting for much of this success are VA counselors at nine regional
loan centers who assist people with VA-guarantied loans avoid
foreclosure through counseling and special financing arrangements.
The
counselors also can assist other veterans with financial problems.
VA
counselors have helped about 74,000 veterans, active-duty members and
survivors
keep their homes since 2000, a savings to the government of nearly $1.5
billion. Depending on a veteran's circumstances, VA can intercede with
the borrower on the veteran's behalf to pursue options -- such as
repayment plans, forbearance, and loan modifications -- that would allow a
veteran to keep a home. To obtain help from a VA financial counselor,
veterans can call VA at 1(877) 827-3702. Information about VA's home
loan guaranty program can be obtained at www.homeloans.va.gov. Since
1944, when home-loan guaranties were offered with the original GI Bill, VA
has guarantied more than 18 million home loans worth $911 billion.
Last year about 135,000 veterans, active-duty service members and
survivors received loans valued at nearly $24 billion. About 2.3 million
home
loans still in effect were purchased through VA’s home-loan guaranty
program, which makes home loans more affordable for veterans, active-duty
members and some surviving spouses by protecting lenders from loss if
the borrower fails to repay the loan. More than 90% of VA-backed
home
loans were given without a downpayment. April 08 data shows that
foreclosures are down more than 50% from the same months in 2003. VA
attributes this to prudent credit underwriting standards, its robust
supplemental loan servicing program and VA financial loan counselors.
[Source:
VA News Release 12 Jun 08 ++]
WINDOWS VISTA UPDATE 05: The negative perception of Windows Vista
may
be catching up to Microsoft in the bank. On 11 JUN a financial analyst
firm lowered its revenue estimate for Microsoft's 2008 and 2009 fiscal
years, citing a negative perception about the operating system that is
affecting its adoption by businesses. The research report by Sanford
C. Bernstein analysts also hinted at the release date for the next
version of Windows code-named Windows 7. In the report, analysts said they
expect Windows 7 to be released in the second quarter of 2010. In
the
report, analysts Charles J. Di Bona, Maureen Murphy and Mariel A. Hardi
lowered their revenue estimates for Microsoft by $49 million for fiscal
2008 and by $395 million for fiscal 2009. While the 2008 revision
didn't affect the firm's earnings estimate of $1.91 per share for that
year, it lowered its 2009 estimate to $2.17 from $2.20, according to the
report. "Support for Vista has been battered across all enterprise sizes
and corporate constituencies," the report stated. "As a consequence,
the Vista cycle looks likely to be materially less robust than indicated
in our prior survey." The key factor has been "overwhelmingly bad
publicity" for Vista, particularly about the option for enterprise
licensees
to downgrade to XP from Vista, and the potential for companies to skip
Vista in favor of Windows 7. The downgrade option has been especially
troublesome for Microsoft, which in some cases has had to extend the
time it will sell XP due to customer demand. The negative publicity has
left businesses with a perception that there is no good reason for them
to upgrade, according to the Bernstein report. "Almost no feature of
the new OS is now seen as a meaningful positive driver for adoption," the
analysts said. Independent analyst Brian Madden concurred. "From a
company standpoint, there is not a single damn reason people should use
Vista," he said. "Will you sell another widget because of Vista? No. And
besides, Vista has so many hardware requirements that you increase your
costs." The Bernstein report also cites costs associated with Vista,
which would require some companies to upgrade their desktop hardware
because of the increased system requirements, a further impediment to
adoption. Moreover, some features of Vista that Microsoft promoted as key
reasons to upgrade, such as security, have been undermined by negative
publicity around tools like User Account Control, a new security feature
many customers have griped about, according to the report. [Source:
IDG News Service Elizabeth Montalbano article 11 Jun 08 ++]
NDAA 2009 UPDATE 04: The House and Senate have been working on their
own versions of the 2009 NDAA, attempting to get a bill to the
President's desk for signature into law by October 1, 2008. The
House approved
their version, H.R.5658, on 22 MAU by a vote of 384-23. The bill has
$601.4 billion in regular funding (excludes war funding) for the
Defense Department. Included in the bill is a 3.9% pay raise;
increases in
full time manning for the Army and Air Guard; allows for Tricare cost
share increases; initiates a 3-year sabbatical program; initiates a
tuition-assistance program for military spouses; buys more aircraft such
as
C-17s, F-22s, C-130s, and F-35s; includes $750 million for Guard &
reserve equipment purchases; and authorizes $65.4 million for
reintegration
programs. The Senate version, S.3001, is still in committee and has
not progressed to the floor for debate or vote yet. The best guess
is
that the Senate will not take up this legislation until after the 4 JUL
recess is over. This bill has $612.5 billion in regular funding. It
also increases full time manning for the Army and Air Guard; allows for
no Tricare fee increases; includes the pay raise and sabbatical
provisions; has $390 million for Guard homeland defense equipment but no
equipment account; authorizes 21 days of paternity leave; and requires DOD
and JCS and NGB to develop a strategic plan for the role of the Guard.
Once the Senate votes their version of the bill, both bills go to
conference committee to iron out any differences. Then the
compromise
conference bill goes back to both chambers for ratification vote, and
following that affirmative vote, it goes to the President for signature
(or
veto). On May 22 MAY the White House issued a veto threat concerning
HR
5658, citing 27 different provisions of concern in the bill. Among
those provisions for which the President would veto the bill are: the pay
raise (3.4% vs. 3.9%), purchase of additional C-17s, F-22s, and F-35s,
and not increasing the Tricare cost share amounts to even higher
levels. [Source: EANGUS Minuteman Update 12 Jun 08 ++]
SOCIAL SECURITY DEBIT CARD: For millions of Americans, accessing
their Social Security benefits is now just a card swipe away. A new debit
card being offered by the Treasury Department gives nearly 4 million
recipients who have no bank accounts an alternative to paper checks that
they must cash, usually at a price. The new debit card, issued by
Comerica Bank, was quietly marketed to nearly 3.5 million recipients of
Social Security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) this spring. It's
now
available to any benefit recipient through enrollment at
www.usdirectexpress.com. States already load child support payments and
unemployment benefits onto debit cards. The federal government has used
prepaid
debit cards, too, for disaster relief aid. But the Social Security debit
card is the largest push to date to switch from costly paper checks to
electronic payments. "Our goal is to move to 100% electronic payments,"
says Judy Tillman, commissioner of Treasury's Financial Management
Service. "It's safer and more reliable for delivery" of funds.
The new debit card will eliminate the need for
consumers without
bank accounts to use costly check-cashing services, the Treasury
Department says. It will also save the government money. The Treasury
estimates that if all 4 million recipients without bank accounts signed up
for
the card, it would save $42 million a year. As with any other debit
card, using it won't always be free. For instance, holders will get one
free ATM withdrawal per month. After that, they'll be charged 90 cents
for each withdrawal. A fee of 75 cents per month also applies if card
holders want paper statements mailed to them. Still, the fees are among
the lowest in the industry for such services, says Nora Arpin, director
of government electronic solutions for Comerica. About 80% of the 57.3
million Social Security and SSI recipients have their benefits directly
deposited into their bank accounts. The challenge will be to get the
remaining consumers to switch from checks to electronic payments such as
direct deposit or the new debit card. The card "might be confusing if
they're not savvy about electronic payments and don't have (experience
with) a bank account," says Chris Allen, a director for Hitachi
Consulting. [Source: USA Today Cathy Chu article 10 Jun 08 ++]
VA BLUE WATER CLAIMS UPDATE 03: The Montgomery Advertiser published
the following article that is reflective of the frustrations of many of
our veterans who served during the Viet Nam conflict:
Joe Moody and Dave Sanderson volunteered to serve their
country
when that wasn't a popular thing to do. They joined the Navy. Both served
on ships off the shore of Vietnam in the 1960s. Joe is 64, Dave is 60,
and they're both sick. They feel abandoned by their country now; when
they need her help the most. Joe was an engineer who served on the USS
Oklahoma City, the flagship of the Seventh Fleet. Dave was a gunfire
technician on the USS Lang. Both received com¬bat pay, as did others of
the 70,000 or so veterans who served as "blue water sailors" during that
war. Both have developed diabetes mellitus, one of the diseases
con¬nected to Agent Orange, a highly toxic herbicide used to defoliate
combat
areas in Vietnam. Both have been denied service-connected compensation
because Veterans Administration rules recently upheld by the courts
say that only those who set foot in Vietnam are eligible. They don't care
so much about the pension. But the medical benefits paid to other
Vietnam veterans would be welcome. Joe has had medical costs taken out of
his Social Secu¬rity check. Dave has congestive heart failure and other
medical problems related to the diabetes. They are among "500 to 1,000"
members of a group called "Blue¬watersailors.org," who have mailed
their Vietnam service med¬als to Sen. Daniel Akaka of Hawaii and Rep. Bob
Filner, chairmen re¬spectively of the Senate and House Veterans Affairs
committees. "We were going to have a march on Washington," Joe said
Friday in a Prattville restaurant. "But most of us were too sick to
march." Dave laughed. "It would have been a pretty short march," he said.
"I
was doing good to walk to the mailbox to mail my medals back." He had
driven from Huntsville. He had on a Navy veteran's cap and a blue water
sailor T-shirt that said, "Still Fighting."
The reasoning goes that they were not exposed to the
defoliant
because they weren't in-country. But they both had photos of their ships
firing on inland positions in Vietnam. You could see the moun¬tains in
the background. Joe said he had been as close as five miles. Dave's ship
routinely operated within 3,000 to 6,000 yards from the shore. Their
drinking water came from desalinized seawater, and they produced copies
of studies that showed the pesticides could have drifted miles
offshore, in the water and in the east-to-west winds. Given the way the
water
was produced, they feel they and their shipmates may have re-ceived a
more concentrated dose of the poison. Their clothes were washed in the
same water. Their mail came from Danang in canvas bags -- Agent Orange
has been proven to cling to canvas. Joe said a guy came on their ship
selling canvas hats from Vietnam. Almost every¬body on board bought one.
Ships carried Agent Orange to Vietnam in the first place. Both had
helped load the 55-gallon drums that had the identifying or¬ange band
around
the top. They physically touched the containers. Dave recalled that
his ship docked in Vietnam near the end of the war. He got off, walked on
the dock for a few minutes, just to be able to say he'd set foot in
Viet¬nam. "If I had a picture of that, or if I could find enough
eyewitnesses to say I had done that, I'd be eligible for benefits," he
said.
"That's just crazy."
The blue water sailors from Australian and New Zealand
ships that
supported operations off the Vietnam shore have been granted aid from
their countries. The men know the denials of their claims are about
money. But they feel it's an insult to the Navy, and to their legacy. It
sets a bad precedent for future veterans -- the thousands who are serving
off¬shore in support of troops in Iraq and Afghanistan today, right
now. Other Vietnam veterans have a beef, Joe said. Air Force vets who
flew over the country would not qualify. Navy pilots would not qualify,
unless they were shot down. They both believe in the good will of their
countrymen. People just don't know about it. "All we want is to be
heard," Joe said. "Let the people know about this, and then let the public
decide what's right." (Note: to obtain additional info on this subject
refer to
http://bluewaternavy.org/).
[Source: Montgomery Advertiser article 8 Jun 08 ++]
VA OMBUDSMAN'S OFFICE: Citing the confusion veterans face when
trying to arrange benefits, the House Veterans' Affairs Health
Subcommittee
passed H.R.2192 on 5 JUN which would create an Ombudsman office within
the Veterans Affairs Department (VA). The bill introduced on 7 MAY
07
and sponsored by Rep. Paul Hodes D-NH) was adopted by unanimous
voice
vote, along with the adoption by voice vote of a substitute amendment
from Veterans' Affairs Health Subcommittee Chairman Michael Michaud
(D-ME). The bill instructs the VA secretary to create an office of
the
ombudsman, and designate the head of the office. The office would act as a
one-stop shop for information on benefits administered by the VA,
including medical, housing and education. When testifying in support of
his
bill before the Health Subcommittee on 14 JUN 07, Hodes said the VA
has separate hotlines for different benefits, and the process can be
confusing to veterans returning from overseas. Michaud's substitute
amendment expanded the duties of the new office. Under the amendment, the
VA
secretary will designate an ombudsman director in each of the
department’s three administrations, health, benefits and cemeteries. The
ombudsman director in each administration will report to the head
ombudsman.
The amendment also defines the official duties of the office of the
ombudsman as providing patient advocacy and problem resolution, provide
assistance in understanding benefits, provide information on claims
submissions, and field complaints from veterans.
The VA secretary will also designate six regional ombudsmen throughout
the United States for both the health and benefits administrations.
However, the VA does not support the bill. VA Undersecretary for Health
Michael Kussman testified at the Health Subcommittee hearing on the bill
that it would create an unnecessary level of bureaucracy within the VA.
Kussman added the VA already has officers such as patient advocates
and benefit counselors, and many state level veterans departments also
have counselors. The bill currently has 43 cosponsors. [Source: Congress
Daily Andy Leonatti article 9 Jun 08 ++]
TRICARE FEES OVERSEAS: U.S. Military retirees and dependents
of both
active duty and retiree members’ of the U.S. Militar residing outside
of the United States will soon be experiencing increased out of pocket
expense of up to double or more for using Tricare. This is happening in
spite of Congress’ continued refusal in past years and their refusal
in MAY 08 to allow DoD’s proposed Tricare fee increases requested in the
2009 NDAA. All active duty military, retirees and dependents are
covered by Tricare for their health care. Tricare is a Department of
Defense
Health Insurance Program developed and authorized by Congress.
Military member’s dependents, retirees and their dependents living in
foreign
countries that are covered under the Tricare Standard Program will soon
have a new “country specific index” applied to all medical claims they
submit to Tricare. This new index is a product of the World Bank’s
survey of the average cost of goods and services in a specific country and
resulted in the development of a percentage factor that reflects what
amount of goods and services $1.00 would buy in the foreign currency.
Unfortunately, this survey was taken in 2005, prior to the decline of
the U.S. dollar overseas and does not accurately reflect the cost of
those goods and services in today’s dollar. Worst yet, since this survey
results are an average of the cost of goods and services, it mixes
private health care cost with the foreign government health care cost,
(which
are normally provided free or at a nominal fee, much like Medicaid).
The program is due to take effect in AUG 08 and will be
phased in
using a higher allowed percentage for the first year and then the World
Bank’s percentage starting on 1 MAR 09. The implementation of this
program is being done under the DOD’s rule making authority; however, it
in effect skirts the U.S. Congress’ directions which established a 25%
co-pay for Tricare Standard beneficiaries. DoD has apparently
rationalized they can do this through the use of survey data from the
World Bank.
Data that even the World Bank states, in it’s handbook on this survey,
must take into consideration the foreign exchange rate, (and
presumably the inflation rate), for a specific country at the time of
making use
of their data. The DOD has ignored that part of the study handbook,
and is going to ignore the vast difference in health care cost in rural
vs. urban settings and private vs. government health care. The program
is scheduled to start in the Philippines and Panama first with the
intent to later make it the standard for all foreign countries where
Tricare
has beneficiaries residing. An example of how this program will affect
the pocket books of the dependents and retirees in the Philippines is;
• A Beneficiary is admitted to a Hospital in Manila for a coronary
bypass and is hospitalized for 10 days.
• The hospitals’ legitimate charges, (the charges that the same
procedure would cost a Philippine citizen), is $11,200.
• Tricare will only allow $6971 for this procedure based on the country
specific index.
• Thus, the beneficiary must pay the hospital the additional $4,229
that Tricare will not pay.
• Tricare will only reimburse the beneficiary 75% of the allowed
amount. The beneficiary is mandated by Federal statute to pay 25% of what
ever Tricare pays. Thus, only $5,228.25 of the$11,200 will be at
government expense.
• The beneficiary will pay the outstanding hospital bill of $4,229 plus
the co-pay of $1,742.75 for a total of $5,971.75 (or 53.32% of the
total hospital bill).
Other examples for out-patient care have shown a beneficiary cost of
60-70-80% of the total amount of the bill. And then comes the kicker. In
most third world countries, such as the Philippines, the patient must
pay the hospital bill and doctors/laboratory bills in full prior to
discharge from the hospital or prior to receiving medical care. Some
hospitals require a deposit of 110% of the estimated hospital bill prior
to
admission. In the Philippines, unlike the U.S., a hospital is not
required to admit a patient or treat a patient without getting paid for
the
medical care given. Using the above example there are very few Tricare
users who could come up with $11,200 within a day in order to get
treated for a life threatening medical condition.
DOD has refused to use a prevailing rate system for the
Philippines, even though this is the manner in which they determine
allowable
charges in the U.S., (and the U.S. rates are adjusted by zip codes and
localities to account for the differences in health care cost in different
parts of the U.S.). This and the use of a new country specific index
will force overseas dependents and retirees to shoulder a higher
percentage of their health care cost than is required of their
counterparts in
the U.S. Speculation as to why this is happening is:
• DOD does not think anyone will notice. They need to find funds to
help with the Iraq war cost. They know, due to all the newspaper articles
concerning poor treatment of active duty and retired military in U.S.,
that they could not extract the savings from U.S. military health
system in the U.S. But the service members and retirees overseas don’t
normally make the news, so why not get the dollars from them.
• Though intentional misuse of data from the World Bank they can ignore
the exchange rate, inflation rate and take an average cost analysis to
derive a reduction in benefits to the overseas retiree and dependent
community.
• By reducing future overseas reimbursements DoD can recoup losses due
to Tricare fraud intensified by inaction of their overseas regional
contractor WPS. (i.e. $100 million over 6 years by Health Visions).
Government should treat equally all active and retired military members
who served their country honorably. If you feel to not do so is
wrong
you are encouraged to contact your Senate and House representatives
and tell them to stop DOD from eroding our overseas military community’s
benefits. Attachment 3 to this Bulletin contains a suggested letter
for mailing to one or more of your Congressional representatives.
Attachment 4 contains extensive background on how we would up in this
situation. Congressional contact information can be obtained from
https://forms.house.gov/wyr/welcome.shtml
. [Source: Various 9 Jun 08
++]
TERA UPDATE 01: Public Law 102-484 granted temporary authority for
the military services to offer early retirements to members with more
than 15 but less than 20 years of service. The retired pay was calculated
in the usual way except that there was a reduction of 1% for every year
below 20 years of service. Part or all of this reduction can be
restored at age 62 if the retired member works in a qualified public
service
job during the period from the date of retirement to the date on which
the retiree would have completed 20 years of service. Unlike members
who leave military service before 20 years with voluntary separation
incentives or special separation benefits, these early retirees are
generally treated like regular military retirees for the purposes of other
retirement benefits. This authority expired on 1 SEP 02. As of 30 SEP 06 &
07, there were approximately 58,000 TERA retirees receiving retired
pay. In FY 2006, TERA retirees were paid approximately $769 million in
2006 and $841 million in 2007. [Source: DoD FY07 Military Retirement
Fund Audited Financial Statement 30 Nov 08 ++]
SSA PRISONER RULES UPDATE 01: Social Security disability benefits
can
be paid to people who have recently worked and paid Social Security
taxes and are unable to work because of a serious medical condition that
is expected to last at least a year or result in death. The fact that a
person is a recent parolee or is unemployed does not qualify as a
disability. Social Security retirement benefits can be paid to people who
are 62 or older. Generally, you must have worked and paid Social
Security taxes for 10 years to be eligible. Social Security benefits are
not
paid for the months you have been sentenced to a jail,
prison or correctional facility or confined to certain public
institutions for committing a crime. And, no benefits can be paid for any
month
in which you violate a condition of your probation or parole. Although
you cannot receive monthly Social Security benefit payments while you
are confined, your spouse or children can be paid benefits on your
record if they are eligible. And if you have worked and paid Social
Security
taxes, survivors benefits also may be paid to certain family members
if you die. SSI can be paid to people who are 65 or older, or who are
blind or disabled and whose income and resources are below certain
limits. No benefits are payable for any month in which you reside in a
jail,
prison or certain other public institutions. Also, you cannot receive
an SSI payment for any month in which you violate a condition of your
probation or parole.
If your Social Security or SSI benefits were suspended
because you
were incarcerated, you can request that they be started again when you
are released from prison. You will need to contact Social Security and
provide a copy of your release documents before they can take action
on your request. If you were not receiving benefits prior to your
incarceration or your benefits were terminated, you will need to file a
new
application for benefits if you think you may be eligible. You should
contact Social Security for more information about filing a claim for
benefits. They will require proof of your release from prison, in addition
to a new application and other documents. If your institution has a
prerelease agreement with the local Social Security office, it will
notify them if you are likely to meet the requirements for SSI or Social
Security benefits. SSA can then process an application several months
before your anticipated release so that benefits can start as soon as
possible after your release. You should contact institutional or social
service staff to find out if the institution has a prerelease agreement
with Social Security. If there is no agreement, when you know your
anticipated release date, contact Social Security to apply for benefits if
you
think you may be eligible so SSA can take prompt action on your
application. For what you can do online refer to
http://www.socialsecurity.gov/onlineservices/
[Source:
http://www.socialsecurity.gov/pubs/10133.html Jun 08 ++]
EXPATRIATE INCOME TAX UPDATE 01: For American expatriates, the
tax
filing deadline this year is 16 June. This means that the tax return
must be at the IRS Service Centre in Austin, Texas by the due date.
Postmarks do not count. For this reason, electronic filing is the better
option over snail mailing. The due date can be extended by filing Form
4868
- Application for Automatic Extension Of Time to File U.S. Individual
Income Tax Return. This form extends the due date to 15 OCT 08. However
you will owe interest on any unpaid taxes that were due 14 APR for the
2007 calendar year. IRS may also assess a late payment penalty of 1/2
of 1% of any tax not paid by the regular due date up to 25%. A late
filing penalty of 5% per month up to 25% can also be assessed if the
return is filed late. Form 4868 can either be filed electronically or by
post. Expatriates making a payment with the Form should send to the IRS
Service Centre at: PO Box 660575, Dallas TX 75266-0575. Those not making
a payment can send to: Austin, TX 73301-0215. [Source: The Tax
Barron
Jun/Jul 08 ++]
IRS STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS: Often American expatriates do not file a
US tax return under several mistaken assumptions. The three main ones
are:
• They file and pay taxes to a foreign country of residence.
• They earn less than the foreign earned income exclusion.
• After many years of not filing to remain under the radar.
Actually US tax laws require US citizens and resident aliens to report
their worldwide income annually unless their income is below the
combination of a Standard Deduction and Exemption amounts. In 2007 a
Single
filer's Standard Deduction was $5,350 and Exemption $3,400. So unless as
a Single filer you were below this $8,750 ($5,350 + $3,400) threshold,
filing an income tax return in a foreign country does not excuse you
from filing stateside. The Foreign Earned Income Exclusion (FEIE), worth
$85,700 in 2007, is intended to help US filers from being taxed twice
on their foreign income. But FEIE cannot be applied against investment
and other forms of income. Nor can it be taken if IRS challenges a
nonfiler to report prior year foreign earnings and decides against
allowing
FEIE. So even if those foreign earnings are excluded from US taxation,
they are still reportable. Staying under the radar is risky,
especially as IRS is steadily increasing its reach via international tax
treaties and auditors. The worst scenario is to be discovered and face
possible criminal sanctions for tax avoidance. Under IRS Statute of
Limitations, taxpayers have three years to claim a tax refund. IRS has
three
years to audit a tax return or assess additional taxes. And ten years to
collect outstanding tax liabilities. Anyone who has not filed a US tax
return for some years from overseas should take the offensive approach by
filing rather than being put on the defensive by an aggressive and
suspicious IRS auditor. The Service asks that three years returns be
filed. [Source: The Tax Barron Jun/Jul 08 ++]
TAX on NEGOTIATED BALANCES: Veterans should be aware of the tax
ramifications of negotiating a credit card debt. If you or a member of
your
family that you claim as a dependent on your tax form become
over-extended on their credit card balances it is possible to negotiate
with many
credit card companies for a reduced balance to clear the debt. However,
once payment is made the credit card company will issue you a Form
1099-C reporting the amount not paid as a discharge of indebtedness
income. This can later be taxed as income by the IRS. [Source: The
Tax
Barron Jun/Jul 08 ++]
SHAD UPDATE 06: Veterans who believe they're suffering health
problems from secret chemical and biological weapons testing conducted
years
ago will testify before Congress the week of 9 JUN on House bill
H.R.5954 introduced on 1 MAY by Rep. Mike Thompson, Mike [CA-1]. Thompson
and
some of the bills 25 cosponsors have been trying for nearly seven
years to get the U.S. Defense Department to acknowledge that the tests
occurred and that affected veterans should be compensated and given
treatment for their diseases. The bill is to amend title 38, United
States
Code, to provide veterans for presumptions of service connection for
purposes of benefits under laws administered by Secretary of Veterans
Affairs for diseases associated with service in the Armed Forces and
exposure to biological, chemical, or other toxic agents as part of Project
112, and for other purposes. It also requires the secretary of Veterans
Affairs to notify all veterans subject to the testing of the potential
hazards. It is estimated there are about 500 veterans still
surviving
that were affected by the project. Rep. Denny Rehberg (R-MT) said in a
prepared statement, "This is great news for all of the Project 112
veterans who have waited decades to receive proper health care. It's
obvious
we've gotten the committee's ear and they're interested in finally
righting this wrong."
The Defense Department now says 6,440 service members
took part in
50 tests under Project 112 between 1962 and 1973, including open-air
tests above a half-dozen U.S. states. In testimony prepared for the
hearing, obtained in advance by The Associated Press, Bradley Mayes, the
Veterans Affairs Department’s director of compensation and pensions,
calls the legislation unnecessary, “due to the lack of credible scientific
and medical evidence that adequately demonstrates any statistically
significant correlation” between the tests and participants’ diseases.
Last year, the Institute of Medicine, which advises the government on
medical and health matters, found no specific health effects as a result
of
Project SHAD Rep. Thompson and others argue that the report was
shoddily done and left out key information. During the tests, conducted
amid
Cold War concerns about the Soviet Union’s weapons capabilities, the
military tested germs such as bacteria that could cause tularemia and Q
fever, serious diseases more commonly found in animals. Also used were
nonlethal simulated agents, including E. coli now known to pose health
dangers. Some of those veterans now suffering from various maladies say
test participants were given experimental vaccines but weren’t told of
any risks, only that the shots were a protective measure. Dr.
Michael
Kilpatrick, the Pentagon’s deputy director for force health protection
and readiness, acknowledges that some participants weren’t fully
informed about the project they were part of but says safety precautions
taken then were appropriate for the time.
Among the various Project 112 tests was SHAD, an
acronym for
Shipboard Hazard and Defense, which was conducted during the 1960s. SHAD
encompassed tests designed to identify US warships' vulnerabilities to
attacks with chemical or biological warfare agents and to develop
procedures to respond to such attacks while maintaining a war-fighting
capability. The Defense Department for years denied that the testing
occurred.
Although it now acknowledges the tests, it won't provide health
benefits through Veterans Affairs for those exposed veterans who are now
suffering various cancers and illnesses. During the SHAD tests crewmembers
were inside ship’s sealed quarters when they were sprayed with
biological and chemical agents in the Pacific Ocean. Participants claim
that
paper filters designed to prevent the agents from getting through the air
ducts to the sealed spaces often deteriorated. They were required to
wash down the boats after the spraying, but they wore the same gear
every day and it was cleaned with cancer-causing agents. Their bunks,
clothes and lockers also were exposed during the cleaning. The
following
are ships used in the SHAD operation along with the tests they were
involved in:
• USS George Eastman (YAG-39): 63-1 Eager Belle I; 63-1 Eager Belle II;
64-2 Flower Drum I; 65-17 Fearless Johnny; ; 66-13 Half Note; 65-4
Magic Sword.
• USS Granville S. Hall (YAG-40): 63-1 Eager Belle II, 63-2 Autumn
Gold; 64-2 Flower Drum I; 64-4 [Red Beva] Shady Grove; 65-6 Big Tom; 65-17
Fearless Johnny; 66-13 Half Note; 68-50 Speckled Start [68-11]; 69-32.
• USS Hoel (DDG-13): 63-2 Autumn Gold.
• USS Berkeley (DDG-15): 65-13 High Low.
• USS Navarro (APA-215): 63-1 Eager Belle II; 63-2 Autumn Gold.
• USS Okanogan (APA-220): 65-13 High Low.
• USS Fort Snelling (LSD-30): 69-10.
• USS Tioga County (LST-1158): 63-1 Eager Belle II; 63-2 Autumn Gold.
• USS Wexford County (LST-1168): 65-13 High Low.
• USS Carpenter (DD-825): 63-1 Eager Belle II; 63-2 Autumn Gold.
• USS Herbert J. Thomas (DD-833): 66-5 Purple Sage; 66-6 Scarlet Sage;
69-31.
• USS Power (DD-839): 65-1 Copper Head.
• USS Fechteler (DD-870): 65-13 High Low.
• USS Carbonero (SS-337): 65-6 Big Tom; 66-13 Half Note; 68-71 Folded
Arrow.
• USNS Samuel Phillips Lee (T-AGS 31): 70-C.
• USNS Silas Bent (T-AGS 26): 70-C
[Source: Billings Gazette Mike Dennison article 6 Jun 08 ++]
VA LAWSUIT (LACK of CARE) UPDATE 08: A federal judge
considering a
lawsuit that alleges inadequate veterans’ medical care on 5 JUN ordered
government lawyers to explain an e-mail by a Veterans Affairs
psychologist suggesting that counselors diagnose fewer post-traumatic
stress
disorder cases in soldiers. The hearing ordered by U.S. District Court
Judge Samuel Conti follows a two-week trial that ended last month.
Veterans groups had sued VA, saying it inadequately addressed a “rising
tide”
of mental health problems, especially post-traumatic stress disorder
and suicides. The plaintiffs asked Conti to reopen the case in light of
the e-mail discovered after the trial ended. The judge agreed, saying
“the e-mail raises potentially serious questions that may warrant further
attention.” He ordered lawyers for both sides to appear in court 10
JUN to discuss whether the e-mail has any bearing on the case.
The document in question is a 20 MAR memo written by
Norma Perez,
who helps coordinate a post-traumatic stress disorder clinical team in
central Texas. “Given that we are having more and more
compensation-seeking veterans, I’d like to suggest that you refrain from
giving a
diagnosis of PTSD straight out,” Perez wrote to VA counselors. “We really
don’t or have time to do the extensive testing that should be done to
determine PTSD.” The e-mail was forwarded to VoteVets.org, an Iraq and
Afghanistan war veterans lobbying group opposed to the Bush
administration’s handling of the war and veterans issues. Lawyers for the
veterans
groups argue that Perez’s e-mail goes to the heart of their case, showing
VA’s indifference to treating mental health. “This is not Joe the
janitor writing this,” said vets’ lawyer Arturo Gonzalez. “This is a
supervisor and it shows how the VA thinks.” Gonzalez wants the judge to
add
the e-mail to the evidence given to him at the nonjury trial in support
of the lawsuit. On 4 JUN, DOJ lawyer James Schwartz wrote the judge a
letter arguing that the e-mail was a mistake, that Perez had been
“counseled” and that it has nothing to do with the lawsuit. “It was the
action of a single individual that in no way represented the policies of
VA,
that, once discovered, was dealt with quickly and appropriately,”
Schwartz told the judge. [Source: Air Force Times AP Paul Elias article
Posted 6 JUN 08 ++]
TRICARE GRAY AREA RETIREE BILL: Rep. Bob Latta (R-OH) has
sponsored
legislation (H.R.6185) that would let reservists who are enrolled in
Tricare Reserve Select (TRS) to continue that coverage after they retire
until they reach age 60, when they become eligible for free Tricare
coverage under current law. Reservists and MOAA who worked closely with
Rep. Latta's staff in crafting the legislation believe strongly that it's
unfair to extend Tricare coverage to drilling reservists, and then
drop them from coverage between the time they stop drilling and the time
they attain age 60. Their career of service demands some option for
continuity of coverage. Under the new bill, these "gray area"
retirees
would pay full-cost premiums to participate in Tricare, contrasted with
those currently drilling, who pay 28% of the premium, with the remaining
72% subsidized by the military. How much the gray area retirees would
have to pay is not quite clear yet. Under current TRS rules, it would be
$289 a month for a single person and $975 a month for a family. But a
recent GAO report concluded that current TRICARE premiums are 45-75%
too high based on actual program costs. As the excessive premiums charged
by DoD do not accurately reflect the actual cost of coverage, GAO
recommended an Executive Order to correct the overcharging, which has not
yet occurred. In the interim both the House and Senate versions of the
FY2009 Defense Authorization Bill direct the Pentagon to recompute the
premiums based on actual costs. Reservists and veterans who would like
to see this inequity corrected are encouraged to go to
http://capwiz.com/moaa/issues/bills/?bill=11460441
where they can find
a preformatted message urging their U.S. representative to cosponsor
H.R. 6185 and the means to send it to their legislators. [Source:
MOAA
Legislative Update 6 Jun 08 ++]
FISHER HOUSE EXPANSION UPDATE 03: Bracing for a generation of war
veterans needing long-term medical care, the Fisher House Foundation plans
to build two dozen homes near military and Veterans Affairs hospitals
in the U.S. By 2011, the non-profit foundation plans to boost its
network of 38 homes to 62, said James Weiskopf, executive vice president
of
communications for the Rockville MD based Fisher House Foundation, Inc.
He said the foundation is expecting an influx of veterans from the
wars in Iraq and Afghanistan with such ailments as traumatic brain injury
and post-traumatic stress disorder. The foundation, created in 1990,
builds homes near military or VA medical facilities for families of
patients needing a place to stay while their loved ones receive care.
Donations allow families to stay at the homes for free. "We’ve largely
taken
care of the needs of the Army, Navy and the Air Force, but the needs of
the [Veterans Affairs] is absolutely huge," Weiskopf said 4 JUN while
on a visit to Landstuhl Germany. "They really need these houses. These
young men and women have got to have their families with them when
they’re going through their rehabilitation, and the house is the means
that
allows them to do that." The foundation plans to finish building five
homes by the end of this year. Four of those homes are near VA
hospitals and clinics. "Our future is really with the [Veterans Affairs
clinics]," Weiskopf said. "The long-term signature wound of this war is
the
traumatic brain injury and that has a long-term period of rehabilitation,
and that will be done by the VA." Landstuhl Regional Medical Center,
the largest military hospital outside the U.S., has two Fisher Houses
that offer 19 rooms. The hospital serves war wounded and patients
stationed at bases across Europe. Weiskopf said there are no plans to
build
any additional houses at Landstuhl because they currently have enough
space to accommodate the need. [Source: Stars and Stripes Scott
Schonauer
article 6 Jun 08 ++]
VETERAN RURAL HEALTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Dr. James B. Peake has appointed 13 people to a new Veterans Rural
Health Advisory Committee, which will advise him on health care issues
affecting veterans in rural areas. The 13-member group will examine ways
to enhance Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care services for
veterans in rural areas by evaluating current programs and identifying
barriers to health care. The committee, chaired by James F. Ahrens,
former head of the Montana Hospital Association, includes affected
veterans, rural health experts in academia, state and federal
professionals
who focus on rural health, state-level veterans’ affairs officials, and
leaders of veterans service organizations. Members appointed are:
• James F. Ahrens of Cascade MT - Former member of Montana governor's
task force on health care.
• Dr. Robert Moser of Tribune KS - Physician who practices in rural
Kansas and Colorado.
• Cynthia Barrigan of Centreville VA - Veteran, now acting
executive
director of Virginia Telehealth Network.
• Charles Abramson of Missoula MT - Air Force veteran who served on the
medical staff ethics committee of St. Patrick Hospital.
• Maj. Gen. John W. Libby of Sidney ME - Adjutant general of the Maine
National Guard.
• Hilda Heady of Morgantown WV - Social worker and associate vice
president for West Virginia Rural Health Association.
• Dr. Ronald Franks of Theodore AL - Psychiatrist and vice president
of the College of Medicine at the University of South Alabama.
• Bruce Behringer of Johnson City TN - Assistant vice president at
East Tennessee State University for Rural and Community Health.
• Rachel Gonzales Hanson of Uvalde TX - Member of National Association
of Community Health Centers.
• Tom Ricketts, Ph.D., of Chapel Hill NC - Director of North Carolina
Rural Health Research Program.
• Michael Dobmeier of South Grand Forks ND - National Judge Advocate
of the DAV and president of the North Dakota Veterans Home Foundation.
• Terry Schow of Ogden UT - Veteran and executive director of the Utah
Division of VA.
• James Floyd of Salt Lake City UT - Native American and director of
the Salt Lake City VA Medical Center.
[Source: VA News Release 5 Jun 08 ++]
WI VET EDUCATIONAL BENEFITS: The Wisconsin G.I. Bill is a state
program that is entirely separate from the federal VA's Montgomery G.I.
Bill. It provides a full waiver (remission) of tuition and fees for
eligible veterans and their dependents for up to 8 full-time semesters or
128
credits at any University of Wisconsin System (UWS) or Wisconsin
Technical College System (WTCS) institution for continuing education, or
for
study at the undergraduate or graduate level. In accordance with 2005
Wisconsin Act 468 effective with the 2007-08 academic year, the tuition
remission is a full 100% of tuition and fees for eligible veterans.
There is no post-service time limitation (such as the federal Montgomery
G.I. Bill 10-year delimiting date) on the use of the benefit. The
veteran may attend full-time or part-time. The benefit may be used for
continuing education, or for study at the undergraduate or graduate level.
Eligibility prerequisites are Wisconsin resident at the time of entry
onto active duty (Character of service and active duty service
requirements apply) and recipient must reside in Wisconsin.
A 100% remission is also provided to the qualifying
dependents of
an eligible veteran (i.e. Spouse; or Unremarried Surviving Spouse; or
child between the ages of 18 and 25) where the qualifying Wisconsin
veteran:
• Is currently rated by the federal VA with a combined
service-connected disability rating of 30% or greater; or
• Died in the line of duty while on active, Reserve, or Guard duty; or
• Died as the direct result of a service-connected disability, as
determined by the federal VA.
For qualifying spouses and unremarried surviving spouses, the benefit
must be used within 10 years of the date of death or the initial
disability rating of 30% or greater. The spouse or unremarried surviving
spouse may attend full-time or part-time. For qualifying children, the
benefit is available only if they attend full-time.
The Veterans Education (VetEd) grant program
provides a
reimbursement grant following successful course completion at an eligible
UW,
technical college, or approved private institution of higher learning.
The grant is based on a credit-bank system that is based on length of
active duty military service to eligible veterans who have not yet been
awarded a bachelor's degree for the reimbursement of tuition and fees.
The veteran and spouse's combined annual income may not exceed $47,500
plus $500 for each dependent in excess of two dependents. Veterans may
concurrently receive Chapter 30 Montgomery G.I. Bill (VA) benefits and
VetEd for the same semester. However, individuals eligible for Wisconsin
G.I. Bill benefits must apply for, and use those benefits in order to
be eligible for VetEd reimbursement. VetEd reimbursement will be reduced
to the extent that tuition and fees have already been paid by other
grants, scholarships, and remissions provided for the payment of tuition
and fees.
Service members, reservists, and veterans pursuing a
college
education may be able to obtain academic credit for military courses they
have completed through the military. Prior to enrollment individuals
should discuss possible credit with the Veterans’ Coordinator at the
college or university they plan to attend; credit received may reduce
attendance time and cost. They may obtain information regarding
transcripts
and potential credit for military experience from the links below.
• The American Council on Education's (ACE): Their College Credit
Recommendation Service (CREDIT) provides access to academic credit for
formal courses and examinations taken outside traditional degree programs.
The ACE Guide to the Evaluation of Educational Experiences in the Armed
Services contains recommended credit awards for formal military
courses and occupations.
http://www.acenet.edu.
• The Department of Defense Activity for Non-Traditional Education
Support (DANTES): Coordinates several programs that advance the acceptance
of military education and experience at civilian colleges and
universities. Additionally, DANTES maintains the educational records of
service
members who have completed DSSTs, CLEP examinations, USAFI (United
States Armed Forces Institute) and GED tests
.http://www.dantes.doded.mil/dantes_web/danteshome.asp?Flag=True
.
• Military Transcript Services: Each branch of service provides
transcripts for current and former service members that include individual
military education, training, and experience, which are evaluated
according to ACE standards for recommended college credit. Refer to Army
http://aarts.army.mil.
; USN & USMC
https://www.navycollege.navy.mil/transcript.html;
and USAF
http://www.maxwell.af.mil/au/ccaf/transcripts.asp;
• The DANTES Subject Standardized Tests (DSSTs): Approved by ACE and
accepted or administered at over 1,900 colleges and universities
nationwide. DSSTs enable people to use the knowledge acquired outside the
classroom to accomplish educational and professional goals. The website
includes downloadable forms, practice tests, and other information.
http://www.getcollegecredit.com.
• Servicemembers Opportunity Colleges (SOC): A consortium of over 1800
colleges and universities pledged to support the higher education needs
of military personnel. SOC works with civilian and military educators
to overcome obstacles associated with gaining a college education when
pursued through traditional means. Among its key goals is the award
of
credit for military training and experience. The SOC Consortium
Guide
provides specific information for awarding credit for national testing
programs, military experience, and other non-traditional learning.
http://www.soc.aascu.org/socgen/SOCGuide.html.
[Source:
http://dva.state.wi.us/Ben_education.asp Jun 08 ++]
PTSD UPDATE 21: A Veterans Affairs Department psychologist denies
that she was trying to save money when she suggested that counselors make
fewer diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder in injured soldiers.
Norma Perez, who helps coordinate a post-traumatic stress disorder
clinical team in central Texas, indicated she might have been out of line
to cite growing disability claims in her 20 MAR e-mail titled
“Suggestion.” She said her intent was simply to remind staffers that
stress
symptoms could also be adjustment disorder. The less severe diagnosis
could
save VA millions of dollars in disability payouts. “In retrospect, I
realize I did not adequately convey my message appropriately, but my
intent was unequivocally to improve the quality of care our veterans
received,” Perez said in testimony prepared for delivery4 JUN before a
Senate
panel. The Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee and the VA inspector
general are investigating whether there were broader VA policy motives
behind the e-mail, which was obtained and disclosed last month by two
watchdog groups. VA has strenuously denied that cost-cutting is a factor
in
its treatment decisions. “One question that was raised repeatedly
about this latest e-mail was, ‘Why would a clinician be so concerned about
the compensation rolls?”’ said Sen. Daniel Akaka (D0HI) who chairs the
Senate panel. “As an oversight body, we must know whether the actions
of these VA employees point to a systemic indifference to invisible
wounds.”
VA Secretary James Peake has called Perez’s e-mail
suggestion
“inappropriate.” VA officials this week said her e-mail was taken out of
context. “The e-mail, as characterized by others, does not reflect the
policies or conduct of our health care system,” said Michael Kussman,
VA’s undersecretary for health, in testimony prepared for the Senate
hearing. “We certainly agree that it could have been more artfully
drafted.”
In her e-mail to staffers at the VA medical center in Temple, Texas,
Perez wrote, “Given that we are having more and more
compensation-seeking veterans, I’d like to suggest that you refrain from
giving a
diagnosis of PTSD straight out. ... We really don’t or have time to do the
extensive testing that should be done to determine PTSD.” Many veterans
and
injured troops have long charged that the government might seek to
reduce disability costs by assigning a lower benefits rating. Last year,
retired Lt. Gen. James Terry Scott, chairman of the Veterans’ Disability
Benefits Commission, said he believed the Army might at least
subconsciously consider cost. A lawsuit filed in San Francisco accuses VA
of
misclassifying PTSD claims.
In her testimony, Perez said symptoms for PTSD and
adjustment
disorder are often similar, as are the treatments for them. She said by
making an initial diagnosis of a lesser disorder, VA staff can begin
treatment right away without going through the arduous process of
diagnosing
PTSD. Perez also noted that awarding disability benefits is not part
of her staff’s work, but she did not say why she chose to cite that as a
factor in urging fewer PTSD diagnoses. Veterans diagnosed with PTSD
are eligible to receive up to $2,527 a month in government benefits. A
recent Rand Corp. study found about 300,000 U.S. military personnel who
served in Iraq or Afghanistan are suffering from PTSD or major
depression, potentially saving the government millions of dollars if
lesser
diagnoses are used in disability benefits decisions. “Although our clinic
is a treatment clinic, we all fully support the compensation process and
the department’s policy of erring in the best interest of the veteran
whenever there is any doubt,” Perez wrote. Perez’s testimony comes
after Peake was called to Capitol Hill last month to answer questions
about
internal e-mails suggesting that VA officials were hiding the number
of veterans trying to kill themselves. One of the e-mails, disclosed
during a San Francisco trial, started with “Shh!” Some lawmakers have said
the VA’s top mental health official who wrote it, Dr. Ira Katz, should
be fired, but Peake has said he has no plans to do so. [Source: Air
Force Times AP article Posted 4 Jun 4 08 ++]
CT VET EDUCATIONAL BENEFITS: Veterans may attend Connecticut Public
Colleges and Universities tuition free. Connecticut statutes provide that
tuition may be waived for qualified veterans attending the University
of Connecticut, Connecticut State Universities and the 12
Community-Technical Colleges. Waivers cover only the cost of tuition for
credit-bearing undergraduate and graduate programs. Other charges, such as
for
books, student activity and course fees, parking, and room and board, are
not waived. To qualify for a waiver at the University of Connecticut
and Connecticut State Universities, veterans generally must be
matriculated, that is, admitted to a degree program. The
Community-Technical
Colleges are more flexible. Remember to take a copy of your separation
papers with you when applying for admission and registering for courses.
Tuition waivers for veterans cover 100% of tuition for General Fund
courses at all public colleges and universities and 50% for Extension Fund
and summer courses at Connecticut State Universities. Waivers cover only
the cost of tuition for credit-bearing undergraduate and graduate
programs. Other charges, such as for books, student activity and course
fees, parking, and room and board, are not waived.
To be eligible for veterans’ tuition benefits at any
college or
university, a veteran must be honorably discharged from the U.S. Armed
Forces with 90 days or more active Military duty during war, and must
have resided in Connecticut for at least one year upon enrolling in
college, and have been accepted to an approved institution. A
veteran’s
dependents can also qualify for tuition waiver if the veteran is declared
missing in action while serving in the armed forces after 1 JAN 06. On
23 May 08 Connecticut Governor M. Jodi Rell signed SB 48 into law. The
new law requires state institutions of higher learning to waive tuition
for any state resident who is a dependent or surviving spouse of an
active duty military member who was a Connecticut resident and killed in
action after September 11, 2001. Also, Local Boards of Education may
award high school diplomas to those World War II veterans who did not
receive them when they left high school before graduation for military
service. [Source: NMFA eNews & www.ct.gov/ctva/site/default.asp 3 Jun 08
++]
WALTER REED DATA BREACH: Sensitive information on about 1,000
patients at Walter Reed Army Medical Center and other military hospitals
was
exposed in a security breach, sparking identity theft concerns and an
investigation by the Army. The chairman of the House Armed Services
Committee, Rep. Ike Skelton (D-MO), said he wants to hear from the Army
about its investigation. Names, Social Security numbers, birth dates and
other information were released, hospital officials said 2 JUN. The
computer file that was breached did not include information such as
medical
records, or the diagnosis or prognosis for patients, they said. Walter
Reed officials declined to explain exactly how the information was
compromised, pending an ongoing investigation by the hospital and the
Army. They would only say that the computer file was found on a
"non-government, non-secure computer network." The medical center
learned of the
breach on 21 MAY from an outside data mining company, which officials
did not identify. They said the company was working for another client,
found the file and contacted Walter Reed. The hospital said it is
working to notify all of the people named in the data file. Letters or
e-mails were being sent out, beginning Monday. Officials declined to say
how
many patients were from Walter Reed and how many were from other
military hospitals.
Walter Reed plans to offer free credit protective
services to
patients whose information was revealed. The hospital also has set up a
hot
line for people to call to see if their information was disclosed
(1-877-854-8542, ext. 9). The disclosure marked the latest in a series of
breaches of government computer records. The federal government has been
stung by a rash of data breaches in recent years.
• At the Agriculture Department, a hacker broke into the computer
system in June 2006 and may have obtained names, Social Security numbers
and
photos of 26,000 Washington-area employees and contractors.
• The Veterans Affairs Department acknowledged a massive breach in May
2006, in which personal data on up to 26.5 million veterans was lost.
• At the Health and Human Services Department, personal information for
nearly 17,000 Medicare beneficiaries may have been compromised in
early 2006 when an insurance company employee called up the data through a
hotel computer but didn't delete the file.
• At the Energy Department, Social Security numbers and other data for
about 1,500 people working for the National Nuclear Security
Administration may have been compromised when a hacker gained entry to its
computer system in 2005.
[Source: Washington Post Jennifer C. Kerr article 2 Jun 08 ++]
U of U HOSPITAL DATA BREACH: University of Utah Hospital and
Clinics
patients are bracing for the unknown as police and prosecutors
investigate the theft of 2.2 million billing records filled with personal
information. Authorities say the records, stolen out of a courier's
personal vehicle earlier this month, put the private data of patients from
the past 16 years at risk. Measures taken so far include offering free
credit monitoring services for at least 1.3 million patients whose Social
Security numbers were compromised, and a $1,000 reward for the return
of the tapes - no questions asked. Salt Lake County Sheriff Jim
Winder
and Lorris Betz, a senior vice president for health sciences for
University Health Care, say the stolen records were on backup tapes
designed
to safeguard the records in case materials housed in the hospitals and
clinics were destroyed. The tapes were taken from the vehicle of an
employee of Sandy-based Perpetual Storage Inc. near the employee's Kearns
home on 2 JUN. The employee had been assigned to pick up the tapes in
a secure company van and transport them to an off-site vault, said
James Nowa, a vice president for sales and marketing for Perpetual
Storage.
He violated company policy by taking them home and leaving them in his
car. A thief then broke into the employee's vehicle stealing a metal
box holding the tapes, Winder said. Nowa said the 18-year veteran
employee has been fired, and the incident is the first of its kind he
knows
of in the company's 40-year history.
An investigation is ongoing, but the theft appears to be the
work
of inexperienced criminals, who likely believed the metal box containing
the tapes was filled with cash, said Winder. After collaborating with
the FBI, Winder said it's unlikely the tapes were stolen to commit
identity theft. There's no evidence any of the information on the tapes
has
been accessed; besides, anyone trying to use the tapes would need
specialized equipment to view the contents, Winder said. But there are
also
no guarantees. Melodie Rydalch, spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney's
Office, said the FBI and the Utah Identity Task Force, which includes
local and county law enforcement agencies, is investigating the thefts.
She warned of federal penalties for anyone who uses stolen identities.
Betz said the university delayed releasing news of the security breach
to the public until the sheriff's office had completed an initial
investigation. The university had worked with Perpetual Storage for 12
years
before the theft but suspended deliveries after the incident. An
assessment of university data security policies and procedures is under
way,
Betz said. [Source: Salt Lake Tribune Melinda Rogers article 11 Jun 08
++]
BANK of NY DATA BREACH: The Connecticut attorney general
announced
that a Bank of New York Mellon contractor lost a laptop containing the
personal information of some 4.5 million bank customers. An unencrypted
backup tape holding the personal information disappeared on 27 FEB
while in possession of a third-party vendor. Potential victims did not
learn of this until 27 MAY giving them little chance of protecting
themselves. Andy Kicklighter, director of product marketing for
GuardianEdge,
provider of mobile data protection solutions, said businesses must
prioritize the need for laptop encryption and search for solutions that
allow for simple implementation and manageability. "IT organizations are
afraid that it will be a big project," he said, adding that companies
who have never experienced a data-loss incident also have difficulty
understanding the ramifications of a breach. "It just hasn't reached their
priority level," Kicklighter told SCMagazineUS.com. (Editor’s Note:
From the preceding it is once again evident that the government it not the
only entity having limited control over data breaches resulting from
human error. Veterans need to protect themselves against personal
losses through some form of identity theft insurance).
An undisclosed number of management-level workers at
AT&T have
been notified that their personal information was stored unencrypted on a
stolen laptop. The laptop was stolen 15 MAY from the car of an
employee. The data on the computer was not encrypted -- a violation of
company
policy -- and included names, Social Security numbers and in some
cases, salary and bonus information. Walt Sharp, a spokesman for AT&T said
the company would not disclose the number of affected individuals, but
indicated there is no reason to believe any of the data was being
targeted when the machine was stolen. "Usually these are property crimes
in
which the drive is wiped clean and resold for profit," he said. The
employee who was in possession of the laptop when it was stolen has been
disciplined. "There are a number of rules governing the handling of
encrypted material and the mobile devices handling that material that
employees must follow," Sharp said. "It is up to the employee to ensure
that
any sensitive material is encrypted." AT&T began notifying victims on
23 May through email and standard mail and is offering them free credit
monitoring. AT&T used the breach as a reminder that employees must
follow policies. [Source: SC Magazine Dan Kaplan article 4 Jun 08 ++]
ALZHEIMER’S UPDATE 04: More than a third of U.S. adults have a
family member or friend who has Alzheimer’s. Half of those who live past
age
85 will succumb to Alzheimer's disease. It is a progressive
neurological disorder that leads to personality changes, memory loss,
intellectual slowing and difficulty with regular activities. Although each
person
with Alzheimer's is different, most individuals affected by the
disease progress through a series of stages. Each stage is characterized
by
more serious symptoms. Although the stages provide a blueprint for
the
progression of Alzheimer's disease, not everyone advances through the
stages similarly. Caregivers report that their loved ones sometimes seem
to be in two or more stages at once, and the rate at which people
advance through the stages is highly individual. Still, being aware of the
stages will help you understand the disease and prepare for potential
symptoms and their accompanying challenges. The following seven stages
were developed by researchers and physicians to describe how your or
your loved one's functioning will change over time. Your doctor might
consolidate the seven stages into early/middle/late or
mild/moderate/severe, so these classifications are provided as well:
Stage 1 (Absence of Impairment): There are no problems with memory,
orientation, judgment, communication, or daily activities. You or your
loved one is a normally functioning adult.
Stage 2 (Minimal Impairment): You or your loved one might be
experiencing some lapses in memory or other cognitive problems
(i.e.faculty for
processing of information, applying knowledge and changing preferences)
, but neither family nor friends are able to detect any changes. A
medical exam would not reveal any problems either.
Stage 3 (Noticeable Cognitive Decline): Family members and friends
recognize mild changes in memory, communication patterns, or behavior. A
visit to the doctor might result in a diagnosis of early-stage or mild
Alzheimer's disease, but not always. Common symptoms in this stage
include:
• Problems producing people's names or the right words for objects.
• Noticeable difficulty functioning in employment or social settings.
• Forgetting material that has just been read.
• Misplacing important objects with increasing frequency.
• Decrease in planning or organizational skills
Stage 4 (Early-Stage/Mild Alzheimer's): Cognitive decline is more
evident. You or your loved one may become more forgetful of recent events
or
personal details. Other problems include impaired mathematical ability
(for instance, counting backwards from 100 by 9s), a diminished
ability to carry out complex tasks (for example, throwing a party or
managing
finances), moodiness, and social withdrawal.
Stage 5 (Middle-Stage/Moderate Alzheimer's): Some assistance with daily
tasks is required. Problems with memory and thinking are quite
noticeable, including symptoms such as:
• An inability to recall one's own contact information or key details
about one's history.
• Disorientation to time and/or place.
• Decreased judgment and skills in regard to personal care
(Note: Even though symptoms are worsening, people in
this stage
usually still know their own name and the names of key family members and
can eat and use the bathroom without assistance.)
Stage 6 (Middle-Stage/Moderate to Late-Stage/Severe Alzheimer's): This
is often the most difficult stage for caregivers because it's
characterized by personality and behavior changes. In addition, memory
continues
to decline, and assistance is required for most daily activities. The
most common symptoms associated with this stage include:
• Reduced awareness of one's surroundings and of recent events.
• Problems recognizing one's spouse and other close family members,
although faces are still distinguished between familiar and unfamiliar.
• Sundowning, which is increased restlessness and agitation in the late
afternoon and evening.
• Difficulty using the bathroom independently.
• Bowel and bladder incontinence (i.e. strong, sudden urges to go to
the bathroom , frequent trips to the bathroom, and leakage).
• Suspicion.
• Repetitive behavior (verbal and/or nonverbal).
• Wandering
Stage 7 (Late-Stage/Severe Alzheimer's): In the final stage, it is no
longer possible to respond to the surrounding environment. You or your
loved one may be able to speak words or short phrases, but communication
is extremely limited. Basic functions begin to shut down, such as
motor coordination and the ability to swallow. Total care is required
around the clock.
[Source:
http://alzheimers.about.com/od/symptomsofalzheimers/a/symptoms.htm
Jun
08 ++]
VA PTSD CLAIM SUPPORT UPDATE 01: Post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
happens after a person faces some traumatic incident that affects the
mind and soul of the person deeply. It involves intense fear,
helplessness and horror that happens because of previously experienced
events.
A person is not able to forget the incident and the memories and the
picture of the incident keep coming back which ultimately becomes a big
stressor which affects their behavior and/or health. The person gets
overly worried about the incident and becomes depressed. PTSD stress
disorder shows many symptoms that work as stressors. Symptoms are:
• Poor concentration and short term memory.
• Depression and Apathy.
• Difficulty in communicating.
• Physical problems.
• Emotional numbing.
• Difficulty in trusting others.
• Stress.
• Anger & Rage.
• Frustration.
• Irritability.
• Isolation.
• Poor self esteem.
• Negative self image.
• Lack of feelings.
• Hypervigilant.
• Easily startled.
• Sleep disturbance or insomnia.
• Flashbacks.
• Anxiety.
• Loss of interest and motivation.
• Poor judgment.
• Guilt and Survivor guilt.
• Intrusive memories.
If you received a diagnosis of PTSD while on active duty and are
suffering from any of the above symptoms you have the basis for a VA claim
for PTSD. If your medical records do not show you were
previously
diagnosed or treated for PTSD and you are suffering from any of the above
which you feel is related to your service you can submit a claim but must
provide proof of involvement in a combat scenario if your claim is
based on a combat stressor. The VA concedes that receipt of any of a
Decoration denoting Combat Service (Combat Action Ribbon, Combat Infantry
Badge, etc.), a Decoration for Valor in Combat (Service Achievement or
Commendation Medal, Bronze Star, etc.), with “V” for Valor, or a Purple
Heart Medal, are grounds to file a claim with the VA for
service-connection of PTSD. To initiate the claim the Veteran just
needs to make a
simple written statement of the symptoms he (or she) is experiencing
at present. When veterans are in denial and won't admit the severity
of
their disability it is helpful if a relative or close friend also
makes a separate written statement of the symptoms they've observed in the
Veteran. Call the VA at 1(800) 829-1000 and ask for the location of the
nearest VA Veterans Center or Healthcare Facility that can assist you.
[Source: VFW VSO Scott H. Langhoff article 2 Jun 08 ++]
MEDICARE FRAUD UPDATE 06: Fraud and abuse costs Medicare an estimated
16 billion dollars every year and leads to higher costs for everyone
with Medicare in the form of higher premiums, deductible and other costs.
Doctors and other health care providers who commit Medicare fraud may
be dishonest about other things as well. Reporting fraud can help
Medicare ensure that people with Medicare receive health care only from
health care professionals who provide quality services. If you report
fraud that cost Medicare more than $100, Medicare may pay you up to 10% of
the money you helped recover, up to $1,000. To report Medicare
fraud,
call the Medicare fraud hotline at (800) 447-8477 or send Fax to
(800)
223-8164 or email
HHSTips@oig.hhs.gov, or mail to Office of Inspector
General , Department of Health and Human Services, Attn: HOTLINE, PO
Box 23489, Washington, DC 2002 and provide the following:
• Personal Data - Your Name, full mailing address and email addee.
If
you would like your referral to be submitted anonymously indicate in
your correspondence or phone call.
• Subject/Person/Business/Department that allegation is against and the
accused full mailing address.
• A brief summary relating to your allegation.
Last year 20% of all Medicare Fraud cases in the U.S. were prosecuted
in South Florida. This a much greater amount than other larger
metropolitan areas around the country. In 2007, U.S. Attorney R. Alexander
Acosta and the Justice Department established a South Florida strike force
of federal agents and prosecutors to target fraudulent providers. The
South Florida strike force prosecuted 120 criminal and civil cases
against 200 defendants who were charged with more than $638 million in
fraudulent Medicare claims. It is considered Medicare fraud is when
doctors
or other providers deceive Medicare into paying when it should not or
paying more than it should. This is against the law and should be
reported. Some types of fraud include
• Billing Medicare for services you never received;
• Billing Medicare for services that are different than the ones you
received (usually more expensive);
• Continuing to bill Medicare for rented medical equipment after you
have returned it;
• Offering or performing services that you do not need in order to
charge Medicare for more services;
• Telling you that Medicare will pay for something when it won’t;
• Using another person’s Medicare number or card
[Source: Medicare Rights Center 2 Jun 08 ++]
NATIONAL MONUMENTS: President Bush has asked his defense and
interior
secretaries to look into designating Pearl Harbor and other historic
World War II sites in the Pacific a national monument. A 29 MAY
presidential memo to Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Interior Secretary
Dirk
Kempthorne said such status could offer the sites additional
protection. “These objects of historical and scientific interest may tell
the
broader story of the war, the sacrifices made by America and its allies,
and the heroism and determination that laid the groundwork for victory
in the Pacific and triumph in World War II,” Bush said. The letter,
posted on the White House Web site, doesn’t say what specific places Bush
has in mind aside from Pearl Harbor. Parts of the naval base which are
already under some form of protection or have historic designation. The
USS Arizona, an underwater grave for over 1,100 sailors and Marines
unable to escape the ship before it sank during the Dec. 7, 1941,
Japanese attack, is currently part of the USS Arizona Memorial run by the
National Park Service. Ford Island, where several of the Navy’s
battleships
were moored during the attack, is a National Historic Landmark. The
island, located at the center of Pearl Harbor, is home to historic
airplane hangers that survived the aerial assault. A red and white striped
airplane control tower on Ford Island delivered the first radio broadcast
of the attack. Next door to Pearl Harbor, the top Air Force commander
in the Pacific today has his headquarters in a building that served as
barracks for Army airmen in 1941. Bullet holes left by Japanese machine
guns are still visible on the outside of the structure’s concrete
walls.
Outside Hawaii, crucial battles were fought at Midway,
Wake and
Guam islands. All are still U.S. territory. Today, Midway is mainly a
wildlife bird refuge and key node in the island chain making up the
Papahanaumokuakea Marine National Monument that Bush established in 2006.
The
former naval base, where the U.S. defeated Japan in June 1942 to turn
the tide of World War II in the Pacific, was named a National Historic
Landmark in 1986. Many areas — particularly Pearl Harbor, Hickam Air
Force Base, and Guam — that would likely be eligible for inclusion in the
monument are still actively used today by the U.S. military. Making
them part of a monument could complicate daily operations for the
services. But Bush’s memo told Gates and Kempthorne that national monument
classification shouldn’t interfere with the military’s business. The
Antiquities Act of 1906 gives the president the authority to make national
monuments of “historic landmarks, historic and prehistoric structures,
and other objects of historic or scientific interest.” The president
doesn’t need Congressional approval to do designate monuments. Other
national monuments include the Statue of Liberty, designated by Calvin
Coolidge in 1924, and the Grand Canyon, made a national monument by
Herbert
Hoover in 1932. [Source: Navy Times AP Audrey McAvoy article posted 1
Jun 08 ++]
HAVE YOU HEARD: A guy is driving around the back woods of Tennessee
and he sees a sign in front of a broken down shanty-style house:
"Talking Dog for Sale" He rings the bell and the owner appears and tells
him
the dog is in the backyard. The guy goes into the back yard and sees a
nice looking Labrador retriever sitting there. "You talk?" he asks.
"Yep," the lab replies. After the guy recovers from the shock of hearing a
dog talk, he says "So, what's your story?" The Lab looks up and says,
"Well, I discovered that I could talk when I was pretty young. I wanted
to help the government, so I told the CIA and they had me sworn into
the toughest branch of the armed services...the United States Marines.
You know one of their nicknames is "The Devil Dogs." In no time at all
they had me jetting from country to country, sitting in rooms with spies
and world leaders; because no one figured a dog would be eavesdropping.
I was one of their most valuable spies for eight years running, but
the jetting around really tired me out, and I knew I wasn't getting any
younger. So, I decided to settle down. I retired from the Corps (8 dog
years is 56 Corps years) and signed up for a job at the airport to do
some undercover security, wandering near suspicious characters and
listening in. I uncovered some incredible dealings and was awarded a batch
of
medals. I got married, had a mess of puppies, and now I'm just
retired."
The guy is amazed. He goes back in and asks the owner
what he
wants for the dog. "Ten dollars," the guy says. "Ten dollars? This dog is
amazing! Why on earth are you selling him so cheap?" "Because he's such
a liar. He never did any of that stuff. He was in the Navy!"
VETERAN LEGISLATION STATUS 13 JUN 08: Refer to the Bulletin’s
House
& Senate attachments for a listing of Congressional bills of interest
to the veteran community that have been introduced in the 110th
Congress. Support of these bills through cosponsorship by other
legislators is
critical if they are ever going to move through the legislative process
for a floor vote to become law. A good indication on that likelihood
is the number of cosponsors who have signed onto the bill. A cosponsor
is a member of Congress who has joined one or more other members in
his/her chamber (i.e. House or Senate) to sponsor a bill or amendment. The
member who introduces the bill is considered the sponsor. Members
subsequently signing on are called cosponsors. Any number of members may
cosponsor a bill in the House or Senate. At
http://thomas.loc.gov you
can review a copy of each bill’s content, determine its current status,
the committee it has been assigned to, and if your legislator is a
sponsor or cosponsor of it. To determine what bills, amendments your
representative has sponsored, cosponsored, or dropped sponsorship on refer
to
http://thomas.loc.gov/bss/d110/sponlst.html.
The key to increasing
cosponsorship on veteran related bills and subsequent passage into law is
letting our representatives know of veteran’s feelings on issues. At
the end of some listed bills is a web link that can be used to do that.
You can also reach his/her Washington office via the Capital Operator
direct at (866) 272-6622, (800) 828-0498, or (866) 340-9281 to
express
your views. You can locate on
http://thomas.loc.gov who
your
representative is and the phone number, mailing address, or email/website
to
communicate with a message or letter of your own making. Refer to
http://www.thecapitol.net/FAQ/cong_schedule.html
for future times that
you can access your representatives on their home turf. [Source: RAO
Bulletin Attachment 29 May 08 ++]
Lt. James “EMO” Tichacek, USN (Ret)
Director, Retiree Assistance Office, U.S. Embassy Warden & IRS VITA
Baguio City RP
PSC 517 Box RCB, FPO AP 96517
Tel: (951) 238-1246 in U.S. or Cell: 0915-361-3503 in the Philippines.
Email:
raoemo@sbcglobal.net Web:
http://post_119_gulfport_ms.tripod.com/rao1.html
AL/AMVETS/DAV/FRA/NAUS/NCOA/MOAA/USDR/VFW/VVA/CG33/DD890/AD37 member
BULLETIN SUBSCRIPTION NOTES:
== To subscribe first add the above RAO email addee to your address
book and/or white list and then provide your full name plus either the
post/branch/chapter number of the fraternal military/government
organization you are currently affiliated with (if any) “AND/OR” the city
and
state/country you reside in so your addee can be properly positioned in
the directory for future recovery. Subscription is open to all veterans,
dependents, and military/veteran support organizations. This
Bulletin
sent to 66,484 subscribers.
== To automatically change your email addee or remove yourself from
Bulletin distribution click the below or send a message which includes
your full name plus your old & new email.