RAO Bulletin Update
15 July 2005
Lt. James "EMO" Tichacek, USN (Ret)
RAO Bulletin Update
15 July 2005
THIS BULLETIN UPDATE CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES:
== BRAC [11] ............................................ (Cost savings estimate
questioned)
== VA Comp Payment Disparity [04] …… (PTSD 2nd review cancelled)
== Agent Orange & Diabetes ……………. (Relationship reinforced)
== Afghanistan, Iraqi Campaign Medals ... (AF approves wearing)
== TRICARE Third Tier Rx …………….. (Standby for some higher copays)
== Tricare Pharmacy Rates [03] ………… (Impotency drugs included in 3Rx)
== CRSC [30] …………………………… (Electronic statement delivery initiated)
== Pseudoephedrine Products …………… (AF removal from exchange shelves))
== Death Gratuity [01] …………………... (Increases effective 1 SEP 05)
== Atomic Veterans Relief Act ………….. (Bill proposes VA eligibility change)
== VA Budget 2006 [08] ……………….... (Shortfall impact on vets)
== VA Budget 2006 [09] ………………… (Bush stops opposing increase)
== Florida Veterans Homes ……………… (Lake City home renovation ++)
== Senior’s Discounts Website ………….. (Could save you some money)
== Colon Cancer Detection ……………… (2nd highest U.S. cancer killer)
== Mouse for Shaky Hands ……………… (Filter out shaky hand movement)
== VA Claim Filing Sources …………….. (You may be eligible)
NOTE: I have relocated to the Philippines. Although my email addee raoemo@sbcglobal.net
is still good and you will see the Bulletin being sent from that addee via my
Mailing List Provider in Europe, I must go on the web to access email sent to me
at this addee. With no DSL available to me at this location it is a lengthy and
time consuming process to open email sent to this addee. Until further notice
request all email be sent to me be via raoemo@mozcom.com.
BRAC UPDATE 11: Military health officials concede that some retirees will see
higher costs if the Base Realignment and Closure Commission accepts a plan to
downsize nine stateside hospitals to outpatient clinics and to refer patients
needing hospitalization to civilian facilities. However, according to the Air
Force surgeon general. most of these patients will still be treated by military
physicians under facility-sharing arrangements with local communities. The
hospital downsizing plan, if accepted by the commission, will impact 148
inpatients a day, 6% of all inpatients treated in military stateside hospitals.
Even if patients are treated off base by military physicians, their
out-of-pockets costs will rise because TRICARE fees and co-payments for off-base
care will apply. Some lawmakers and military associations have criticized the
move as an attempt by the Bush administration to deny on-base medical care to
more service beneficiaries, particularly retirees and their families. However,
the military contends the actual goals are to create a more cost-efficient
medical system, improve patient care and enhance medical staff skills and combat
readiness.
Hospitals slated to downsized to clinics or outpatient surgery centers are at
the: Air Force Academy, Colo.; MacDill AFB, Fla.; Great Lakes Naval Training
Center, Ill.; Scott Air Force Base, Ill., Andrews Air Force Base, Md.; Keesler
AFB, Miss.; Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, N.C., Fort Knox, Ky., and
Fort Eustis, Va. The estimated cost-savings is $62 million a year. Two medical
centers also will lose their inpatient mission but to nearby military
facilities. Wilford Hall Medical Center at Lackland AFB, Texas, will send
inpatients to Brooke Army Medical Center, 16 miles away. Brooke will be renamed
the San Antonio Regional Medical Center. Walter Reed Army Medical Center in
Washington D.C. will close. Its patients will be treated at Bethesda Naval
Medical Center, six miles away, which will be renamed the Walter Reed National
Military Medical Center at Bethesda. Whether treated in military or civilian
hospitals, active duty family members enrolled in Tricare Prime, the managed
care network, pay no hospital charges. If not enrolled, they pay $13.90 a day at
a civilian hospital. Enrolled retirees and their dependents under age 65 pay $11
day. But under-65 retirees who rely on Tricare Standard, the military’s
fee-for-service plan, pay $250 a day in civilian hospitals, or 25% of negotiated
charges plus 20% of negotiated professional fees, whichever is less. Older
retirees sent to civilian hospitals typically have Medicare and Tricare for Life
coverage which covers almost all their costs.
Congressional auditors found in a report released on 2 JUL the Defense
Department’s process for deciding which military bases to shutter was “logical,
reasoned and well-documented,” but questioned some of the Pentagon’s cost
savings estimates. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) review of the
Pentagon’s base realignment and closure process, mandated by law, concluded that
Defense officials had varying success in achieving their 2005 BRAC goals of
reducing surplus infrastructure to create savings, furthering the department’s
transformation and encouraging greater cooperation among the military services.
The 273-page report O-05-785 raised some questions about Defense’s projection of
$50 billion in savings from this BRAC round, noting that the closure and
realignment process requires an upfront investment of an estimated $24 billion.
Much of the savings would result from the elimination of jobs held by military
service personnel. But Defense officials have said people in these positions
will be reassigned to other positions without recognition that these are not
dollar savings that can be readily applied elsewhere. The GAO noted that this
could create a false sense of savings available for other purposes. GAO auditors
also expressed heightened concern about savings projections resulting from the
transformation of business processes at Defense were not well-defined. GAO
recommended, and the Pentagon agreed, that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld
develop a method for tracking and updating savings estimates as the BRAC
recommendations are implemented. In May, Rumsfeld unveiled a list of 222 BRAC
recommendations, including 837 closures and realignments. The GAO report will be
used by the independent Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission in
completing its review of Rumsfeld’s recommendations and putting together the
final BRAC list. Those recommendations will be submitted to President Bush Sept.
8 and he must approve or disapprove them by Sept. 23. Congress then must either
reject the list or allow it to become official within 45 days of presidential
endorsement. [Source: Military.com Tom Philpott article 29 JUN 05, GOVEXEC.com
Daily Briefing 1 JUL 05 ++]
VA COMP PAYMENT DISPARITY UPDATE 04: The VA pulled back a week-old policy that
required the most seriously disabled veterans to wait for a second review on
their cases before the agency would pay any money. The VA decided it needed to
revise their JUN 05 directive that was issued to all 57 regional VA offices
through a memo (a copy of which was obtained by the Chicago Sun-Times) that
required two approving reviews for veterans to be granted disability for
post-traumatic stress disorder or to be deemed 100% disabled or unemployable. A
point of contention among many veterans was that the directive had not required
a second review to deny such cases. Senators Dick Durbin and Barack Obama also
thought the policy "ignored" the possibility that denials could be wrong. The
two Illinois senators sent VA Secretary Jim Nicholson a letter calling the
policy "disturbing" and demanding that denials for PTSD claims receive extra
scrutiny. The VA inspector general's investigation last month showed that PTSD
and mental disabilities were among the most highly subjective cases in the
nation. That report also showed that states where VA offices pay the most
disability also have the largest percentage of veterans who are 100% disabled
for PTSD. Only 2.8% of Illinois' veterans are rated 100% disabled for PTSD and
Illinois is last in the nation for disability pay. Durbin and Obama cited the
inspector general's report as one more reason denials should be included in the
extra reviews. In their letter, the senators also asked that the VA send notices
to all Illinois veterans who have filed claims over the last several decades.
Nicholson sent a special squad to the Chicago VA in June to re-evaluate denied
claims of Illinois veterans but no formal procedure has been set up to review
those claims and veterans have not been informed that they can ask that their
claims to be re-evaluated. [Source: Chicago Sun-Times 22 JUN 05]
AGENT ORANGE AND DIABETES: The DoD released 8 JUL 08 the latest report of the
Air Force Health Study on the health effects of exposure to herbicides in
Vietnam, which includes the strongest evidence to date that Agent Orange is
associated with adult-onset diabetes. This supports the findings from earlier
reports in 1992 and 1997. The Air Force Health Study summarizes the results of
the 2002 physical examination of 1,951 veterans, which is the final examination
of the 20-year epidemiological study. The Ranch Hand Study was named after the
operation responsible for spraying herbicides in Vietnam between 1962 and 1971
to deny cover and destroy crops of the North Vietnamese Army. Since the first
examination in 1982, the Air Force has tried to determine whether long-term
health effects exist in the Ranch Hand pilots and ground crews, and if these
effects can be attributed to the herbicides used in Vietnam, mainly Agent Orange
and its contaminant, dioxin. The report, along with many other studies on
herbicide and dioxin exposure, will be reviewed by the National Academy of
Sciences. Based upon this review, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs can ask
Congress for legislation on disability compensation and health care.
Results from the 2002 physical examination support adult-onset diabetes as the
most important health problem seen in the Air Force Health Study. They suggest
that as dioxin levels increase, not only are the presence and severity of
adult-onset diabetes increased, but the time to onset of the disease is
decreased. A 166% increase in diabetes requiring insulin control was seen in
those with the highest levels of dioxin. This is consistent with the strong
evidence found in animal studies. Cardiovascular disease findings were not
consistent, but separate studies have found an increased risk of cardiovascular
death in Ranch Hand enlisted ground crews, the subgroup with the highest average
serum dioxin. Overall, Ranch Hand pilots and ground crews examined in 2002 had
not experienced a statistically significant increase in heart disease relative
to the comparison group. Associations between measures of cardiac function and
history of heart diseases and herbicide or dioxin exposure were not consistent
or clinically interpretable as adverse. Other findings included an increase in
the frequency of reported acne after service in Southeast Asia in Ranch Hand
enlisted ground crew members, but the lack of corresponding patterns of skin
lesions observed at the physical examination rendered this finding difficult to
interpret. Finally, several blood tests regarding liver function and blood
lipids were elevated and did tend to increase with dioxin level. However, these
tests which may be elevated for many reasons, do not constitute a disease by
themselves and cannot be explained by other findings in the study. At the end of
the 20 years of follow-up, Ranch Hand pilots and ground crews as a group
exhibited no statistically significant increase in the risk of cancer relative
to comparisons. Differences by military occupation were inconsistent. Most
importantly, the Ranch Hand enlisted ground crews, the subgroup with the highest
dioxin levels and presumably the greatest herbicide exposure, exhibited a 14%
decreased risk of cancer. These results do not suggest that herbicides or dioxin
exposure are related to cancer in these veterans.
The report emphasizes three major limitations to the study. First, the results
cannot be generalized to other groups, such as all Vietnam veterans or
Vietnamese civilians, which have been exposed in different ways and to different
levels of herbicide. Second, the size of the study makes it difficult to detect
increases in rare diseases, thus small increases in rare diseases may be missed
by the study. Third, other variables that were not considered in this report
could be confounding factors influencing the results. The report is available on
the Air Force Health Study Web site at: www.brooks.af.mil/AFRL/HED/hedb/default.html
[Source: DoD News Release No. 682-05 dtd 8 JUL 05]
AFGHANISTAN, IRAQI CAMPAIGN MEDALS: The Air Force has approved the wearing of
the Afghanistan, Iraqi campaign medals. These DoD campaign medals apply to
active duty, Reserve and Guard personnel deployed on or after 24 OCT 04 for
Operation Enduring Freedom and 19 MAR 03 for Operation Iraqi Freedom. Airmen
must have been assigned, attached or mobilized to units operating in Afghanistan
or Iraq for 30 consecutive days or 60 nonconsecutive days to be eligible. The
ACM is awarded for service for all land areas and all airspaces above
Afghanistan. The ICM is for service covering all land areas of Iraq, all
adjoining water areas out to 12 nautical miles and all airspaces above those
areas.
Service members are not entitled to more than one campaign and/or expeditionary
medal for the same action, achievement, or period of service. In addition, there
are no devices for the ACM, ICM, and Global War on Terrorism Medal. A period of
service is defined as an area of deployment, and includes the number of days
criteria outlined above. Members begin a second period of service when they
forward deploy or return to home station and then redeploy later. Airmen
deployed to Afghanistan or Iraq, who have 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive
days, between the eligibility period and 30 APR 05 may elect to wear either the
appropriate campaign medal or the GWOT-E medal, but not both. Those who deployed
to Afghanistan or Iraq, who have 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days, after
30 APR can only earn the respective campaign medal for the area they served in.
The Air Force Personnel Center will do a mass system update in August to convert
GWOT-E medals to ACMs or ICMs, for Airmen now eligible for one of the campaign
medals. Airmen who do not want the GWOT-E medal converted should notify their
commander's support staff or military personnel flight. The ACM shall be
positioned below the Kosovo Campaign Medal above the ICM, and the ICM shall be
positioned below the ACM and above the GWOT medal. For more information, contact
the local CSS or MPF. [Source: AFPC Release No. 056 dtd 27 JUN 05]
TRICARE THIRD TIER Rx: DoD has announced the start of the uniform formulary
program, placing three medications on the third tier (more expensive)
“non-formulary” category. Starting 17 July, the following medications will
require a $22 copayment:
- Nexium for stomach problems and ulcers,
- Teveten and Teveten HCT for high blood pressure.
Depending on where the prescription is filled, beneficiaries will pay $22 for a
30-day supply of these medications from a TRICARE Retail Pharmacy (TRRx) or a
90-day supply from the TRICARE Mail-Order Pharmacy (TMOP). In non-network retail
pharmacies, the copayment will be $22 or 20% of the cost, whichever is higher.
Third-tier drugs will not be stocked in military treatment facility (MTF)
pharmacies, but can be special-ordered if an MTF physician (or a non-MTF
physician to whom the patient was referred) determines they are medically
necessary for a particular patient. Beneficiaries who are taking Nexium, Teveten,
or Teveten HCT should check with their doctors to see if a less-costly
medication would be equally effective. Providers who believe there is a valid
medical reason why a patient must take the non-formulary third tier medication
can request a medical-necessity determination. Beneficiaries who already have
established medical necessity for Nexium with the TMOP system must get another
medical-necessity determination by July 17 to continue receiving the medication
at the $9 copayment. Beneficiaries without an updated medical-necessity
determination will have to pay the $22 cost share. Beneficiaries can expect more
drugs to be added to the third tier category in DoD’s attempt to cut overall
medical cost. [Source: MOAA JUN 05]
TRICARE PHARMACY RATES UPDATE 03: The DoD Beneficiary Advisory Panel (BAP) met
in June to review the recent recommendation of the DoD Pharmacy and Therapeutics
Committee (P&T) to move Viagra and Cialis used by more than 128,000 military
beneficiaries, to third tier non-formulary status. The P&T committee concluded
that none of popular impotency drugs is more clinically effective but Levitra is
cheaper to stock. Only 10% of military patients with erectile dysfunction use
Levitra whreas 77% use Viagra and 13% use Cialis. This status would raise the
co-pay for these drugs to $22, vs. the normal $9 charged for brand-name drugs in
the DoD formulary. If the change is approved, members currently taking those
drugs would need to switch to the one remaining ED drug in the formulary (Levitra)
if they want to keep the $9 co-pay. Also, this would effectively put two-thirds
of the drugs in this class (representing 96% of ED prescriptions) in
non-formulary status. The BAP panel composed of representatives from the DoD
contractors, the US Family Health Plan, and an independent physician was split
four and four in their votes for and against supporting the P&T committee's
recommended plan. The tie vote on the main issue means that Levitra probably
will end up being the only ED drug available through TRICARE at the $9 copay.
The BAP did recommend delaying implementation until 120 days after final
approval, to give more time to notify members currently taking those
medications.
The BAP concurred with P&T's recommendations to move several less-frequently
prescribed antifungal drugs to the third tier: Spectazole, Oxistat, Ertaczo,
Exelderm, and Loprox. Seven other drugs in this class will remain on the
formulary, giving patients and providers multiple prescription choices. The BAP
also concurred with the P&T recommendation to retain all Multiple Sclerosis
drugs (Avonex, Rebif, Betaseron, Copaxone) on the DoD formulary. Since
individuals can vary widely in their reactions to the drugs, both panels felt it
was essential to preserve the full range of drug options for beneficiaries
afflicted by this serious disease. Dr. William Winkenwerder, Assistant Secretary
of Defense (Health Affairs), will now review the two panels' recommendations
before issuing a final decision regarding the drugs and implementation periods.
For more details on the Uniform Formulary, visit TRICARE's website at
www.tricare.osd.mil/pharmacy/unif_form.cfm. [Source: Military.com Tom Philpott
article 29 JUN 05 ++]
CRSC UPDATE 30: The Defense and Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) has begun
electronic delivery of Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) account
statements for military retirees. For those retirees who qualify to receive CRSC,
the statements will be available on a monthly basis starting 1 JUL on the DFAS
online pay account site at https://myPay.dfas.mil. The account statements
provide detailed information regarding continuing monthly CRSC payments,
including disability ratings, unemployability, Purple Heart indicators, as well
as other entitlement data. Retirees may continue to contact the Retired and
Annuitant Contact Center by phone at 1(800) 321-1080, but DFAS officials say the
statement should answer most, if not all, questions regarding computation of
CRSC payments. Officials note that the current monthly statements will only
contain data concerning a retiree’s continuing monthly payment. Details about
retroactive payments will be available through myPay by the end of the year. The
myPay Web site is the only means of retirees receiving a CRSC monthly statement.
The Web-based myPay system delivers personal pay information and provides the
ability to process pay-related transactions timely, safely and securely for all
its members. The online system eliminates the risks associated with hard-copy
documents by allowing members to access their electronic1099R, Retiree Account
Statement (RAS) and other financial information. Individuals who do not yet have
a myPay account or who already have a myPay PIN, but have forgotten their number
can call DFAS at 1(800) 390-2348 to get a Personal Identification Number (PIN)
for an account or request one online at the myPay site. [Source: NavyTimes staff
1 JUL 05]
PSEUDOEPHEDRINE PRODUCTS: The Army & Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES) will
remove products containing the solid form of pseudoephedrine from all store
shelves effective 31 JUL 05. These items include Advil Flu & Sinus, Aleve Cold &
Sinus, Claritin D and Tylenol Allergy Sinus. The affected items will be replaced
with products containing phenylephrine, an acceptable substitute for
pseudoephedrine, as a relief for sinus congestion. To date, 16 states have
passed legislation restricting the availability of cough and cold medicines
containing the drug pseudoephedrine in solid form. AAFES has decided that
removal of these products from all of its stores is in the best interest of all
military communities. Pseudoephedrine and ephedrine, are highly coveted by drug
traffickers who use them to manufacture methamphetamine, a controlled substance,
for the illicit market. The diversion of over-the-counter pseudoephedrine
containing products is one of the major contributing factors to the
methamphetamine situation in the U.S. Inappropriate retail level purchases by
individuals attempting to procure pseudoephedrine for the illicit manufacture of
methamphetamine have been documented as a source of much of the pseudoephedrine
found in clandestine methamphetamine laboratories. [Source: Air Force Retiree
News 1 JUL 05 & www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov Notice]
DEATH GRATUITY UPDATE 01: The Department of Defense announced 1 JUL 05 a
significant increase in the death gratuity for the survivors of service members
killed in action and the Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (SGLI) coverage
for service members deployed to designated combat zones. The Emergency
Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror and
Tsunami Relief Act 2005 (Public Law 109-13) increases this immediate cash
payment from $12,420 to $100,000 for survivors of those whose death is as a
result of hostile actions and occurred in a designated combat operation or
combat zone or while training for combat or performing hazardous duty. The
supplemental also increases the maximum amount of SGLI coverage from $250,000 to
$400,000 for all service members effective 1 SEP 05 and provides that the
department will pay or reimburse the premiums to service members, who are
deployed in a designated combat zone for $150,000 of SGLI coverage. Until the
effective date for the SGLI increase, the supplemental provides for a special
death gratuity of $150,000, retroactive to 7 OCT 01, for survivors of those
whose death is in a designated combat operation or combat zone or occurred while
training for combat or performing hazardous duty. The Secretary of Defense has
designated all areas where service members are in receipt of the combat zone tax
exclusion as qualifying combat zones and all members deployed outside the United
States on orders in support of Operation Enduring Freedom or Operation Iraqi
Freedom as participating in qualifying combat operations.
Effective immediately, survivors of service members, who die in these qualifying
zones or operations, will receive the increased benefits. The services will also
identify eligible survivors of service members who died in these designated
zones and operations since 7 OCT 01 and begin making the retroactive payments
within a few days. The process of identifying all eligible beneficiaries and
completing these retroactive payments will take several months. Survivors of
members who did not die in a designated combat operation or combat zone, but
were training for combat or performing hazardous duty, will also qualify for the
increased benefits. Circumstances that qualify include: aerial flight, parachute
duty, demolition duty, diving duty, war games, practice alerts, tactical
exercises, leadership reaction courses, grenade and live fire exercises,
hand-to-hand combat training, confidence and obstacle courses, accident
involving a military vehicle or military weapon, exposure!
to toxic fumes or gas and explosion of military ordnance. No amount of monetary
compensation or level of assistance can replace a human life. However, it is our
country’s duty to recognize the loss of a service member with dignified and
appropriate support for the family members left behind. These death benefit
enhancements recognize the direct sacrifice of life of those service members
placed in harm’s way and in service to the nation. All beneficiaries for
retroactive payments will be contacted by mail or telephone. If someone is not
contacted, but thinks he may be entitled to added benefits, he may inquire at
the following addresses or telephone numbers:
--- Army: Department of the Army Casualty Operations at 1(800)626-3317.
--- Navy: Navy Personnel Command (PERS-62), 5720 Integrity Drive, Millington, TN
38055-6200 or call 1(800) 368-3202.
--- Air Force: Air Force Personnel Center Casualty Services Branch at AFPC/DPFCS,
550 C Street West, Suite 14, Randolph AFB TX 78150-4216 or call 1(800) 433-0048.
--- USMC: HQMC Casualty Office, 3280 Russell Road, Attn: MRPC, Quantico, VA
22134 or call 1(800) 847-1597.
--- USCG: _ Coast Guard Personnel Services Center, 444 SE Quincy St., Topeka KS
66683-3591; Phone 785-339-3570.
[Source: DoD News Release1 JUL 05]
ATOMIC VETERANS RELIEF ACT: H.R.2962 introduced by Representative Neil
Abercrombie (D-HI) will revise the eligibility criteria for presumption of
service-connection of certain diseases and disabilities for veterans exposed to
ionizing radiation during military service, and for other purposes. For years
atomic veterans have not received adequate consideration on their claims for
exposure to ionizing radiation. Since the 1980s, claims for Department of
Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits by atomic veterans for radiogenic diseases, which
are not currently on the presumptive list of diseases, have required an
assessment to be made by DTRA (Defense Threat Reduction Agency) as to the nature
and amount of the veteran’s radiation doses. The accuracy of the Government’s
radiation dose reconstruction program has been questioned and doubted for a long
time. The National Research Council’s most recent review of the DTRA Dose
Reconstruction Program confirmed that dose estimates have been miscalculated and
often based on arbitrary assumptions resulting in grossly underestimating the
actual radiation exposure. H.R. 2962 would correct injustice by revising the
eligibility criteria for presumption of service connection for radiogenic
diseases and remove the uncertainties related to dose quantification, often
constructed years after all service records have been retired or destroyed. To
ask your Congressional representatives to cosponsor and actively support this
bill you can send them a preformatted message at http://capwiz.com/usdr [Source:
USDR Action alert 1 JUL 05]
VA BUDGET 2006 UPDATE 08: The VA claimed that through their ongoing program of
shifting funds dedicated to replace old equipment and conduct maintenance the
department could address its budget shortfall and meet veterans’ demand for
timely, high quality health care. In the interim the House agreed to a $3,100
pay raise for Congress next year bringing their annual salaries to $165,200.
Ranking Democrat on the House Veterans Affairs Committee, Congressman Lane Evans
(D-IL), and his staff conducted research to determine the impact on veterans
from how VA was coping with the shortfall resulting from Congress' approval of a
budget that was $1 billion less than what was needed. The following snapshots
from across the nation reflect the stark reality of the budget shortfall on
veterans’ access to safe, high quality care:
-- The 3 surgical operating rooms at the White River Junction VAMC in Vermont
had to be closed on June 27 because the heating, ventilation, and air
conditioning system was broken and had not been repaired due to the siphoning of
maintenance funds to cover the budget shortfall.
-- The VAMC in San Antonio could not provide a paraplegic veteran with a special
machine to help clean a chronic wound because the facility did not have the
equipment dollars.
-- The VAMC in Lebanon, Pennsylvania, closed its Geriatric Evaluation and
Management Unit which does extensive case management to help elderly veterans
increase their functioning and remain at home.
-- The Community Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs) needed to meet veterans’
increased demand for care in the North Florida/South Georgia VA Healthcare
System have been delayed due to fiscal constraints. The Gainesville facility has
made progress in reducing its wait lists, but as of April there were nearly 700
service-connected veterans waiting for more than 30 days for an appointment.
-- VA Medical Centers in VISN 16, which includes Arkansas, Oklahoma, Mississippi
and Louisiana and part of Texas, have stopped scheduling appointments for many
veterans who are eligible for care, pending available resources.
-- Even though the VA Palo Alto, California, Health Care System has used $3
million in capital funds for operating needs, as of March 1 more than 1,000 new
patients had to wait more than 30 days for a primary care appointment. A third
of these new patients had to wait more than 3 months. More than 5,000 patients
had to wait more than 30 days for a specialty care appointment. Roughly 1,400
had to wait more than 3 months.
-- The replacement of the fire alarm system at the Loma Linda VAMC in California
won’t be done this year because the facility is using most of its capital funds
to cover operating expenses.
-- The White River Junction VAMC in Vermont is struggling with a $525,000
shortfall in its prosthetics budget. Because the FY 2005 budget is inadequate,
the facility has not been allowed to hire 3 additional mental health care staff
and 3 additional Registered Nurses for the ICU. Nurses in the ICU have been
forced to work double shifts, which this Committee has found to be an unsafe
patient practice.
-- Even though the San Diego VAMC expects to exceed its goal in medical care
cost collections, it will divert $3.5 million of non-recurring maintenance funds
to partially cover operating expenses, and has delayed filling 131 vacant
positions for 3 months. The facility has a waiting list for patients of 750
veterans.
-- Because the Iowa City VAMC had to shift maintenance funds and equipment funds
to cover a FY 2004 million shortfall of $3.2 million in medical care expenses in
FY 2004, the facility is facing severe infrastructure problems and a larger
shortfall of $6.8 million in FY 2005 that puts patient care and safety at risk.
The facility wanted to spend $950,000 in non-recurring maintenance funds last
year to prevent a mechanical failure of the electrical switcher, which would
close the facility, but was required to use those funds to cover a budget
shortfall in medical care last year. As a result in FY 2005, the VA must divert
$1.5 million of medical care funds to maintain the key electrical switchgear for
the hospital.
-- Recently, a motor failed on a hospital bed, which the VA planned to replace
but couldn’t because of the shortfall, causing a fire with the patient on the
bed. Fortunately the patient was able to get out of the bed safely, but the
facility was forced to expend $700,000 of medical care dollars to replace all
the beds, which thanks to the diligence of VA staff lasted 7 years beyond their
life expectancy. The facility could not use capital funds to replace the very
old beds because the money had already been siphoned off to cover medical care.
To bring the shortfall down to $6.2 million the facility has delayed hiring
staff for 4 months. deliberately short staffing nurses on the psychiatric ward
as a means to correct the budget shortfall. This has forced the VA to cut the
beds available for treatment in half.
-- As a result of cost cutting measures to make up for the shortfall in FY 2005,
the Portland, Oregon, VAMC is delaying all non-emergent surgery by at least six
months. For example, veterans in need of knee replacement surgery won’t be
treated because of the budget shortfall.
-- Since FY 2002, the Portland VAMC has had to use its equipment and
non-recurring maintenance funds to cover medical care expenses. For FY 2005 the
facility needed $13 million for medical and clinical equipment but only received
$2 million. The facility is reducing staff as a cost-cutting measure and is now
short at least 150 hospital staff, including nurses, physicians, and social
workers. As a result of budget cuts for staffing, the VA has cut the number of
medical beds available to care for veterans. Veterans in need of outpatient
psychiatric treatment at the Portland facility are on a waiting list because of
the budget shortfall.
-- The Biloxi, Mississippi, VAMC has diverted maintenance dollars to meet
operating expenses for the past two years but the facility will not be able to
balance its budget without reducing staffing levels at a time when the Gulf
Coast Veterans Health Care System has approximately 100 new veterans seeking
enrollment each week.
-- Fifty percent of all the veterans receiving home health care through the San
Antonio VAMC will now have to fend for themselves. This cost-cutting measure
means that some 250 veterans, including those with spinal cord injuries, will no
longer be provided this care.
-- The VA Connecticut Healthcare System is facing a major budgetary challenge of
sending veterans to non-VA facilities for hospitalizations because the VA has a
shortage of beds to care for veterans and staff.
-- Due to the budget shortfall, the VA facility in Bay Pines, Florida, has been
forced to put veterans who have a service-connected illness or disability rating
of less than 50% on a waiting list for primary care appointments. As of late
April, some 7,000 veterans will be waiting longer than 30 days for a primary
care appointment.
[Source: Veteran & Retiree News report from Democratic_Leader_Pelosi@mail.house.gov
dtd 30JUN 05]
VA BUDGET 2006 UPDATE 09: The Senate, after a series of angry partisan
exchanges, unanimously approved 29 JUN $1.5 billion in emergency funds for the
Department of Veterans Affairs' health care programs. The action is the first
step in what now appears to become a total increase of at least $2.5 billion in
fiscal 2005 and 2006. Hours before the Senate's 96 to 0 vote, the last opponents
in the House and Bush administration to boosted VA spending told reporters that
they have abandoned their resistance. House Veterans Affairs Committee Chairman
Steve Buyer (R-Ind.) and Veterans Affairs Secretary Jim Nicholson, who had both
argued that the department could get through this year without additional cash,
held a joint news conference to announce "immediate action" to fill a fiscal
2005 shortfall of at least $1 billion, and another shortfall of at least $1.5
billion in the House-passed appropriation for VA health care in fiscal 2006.
Nicholson told lawmakers that the administration had vastly underestimated the
number of service personnel returning from Iraq and Afghanistan who would seek
VA medical treatment. The estimates had been based on outdated assumptions from
2002. The developments marked the failure of the administration and GOP
congressional leaders to force tough spending constraints on the department,
which is backed by some of the most influential lobbies in the capital.
With the 2006 midterm elections approaching and President Bush's favorability
ratings at low levels, Republicans in the House and the Senate clearly had no
stomach for risking the wrath of former service members in the cause of deficit
reduction. Virtually all veterans groups -- including the American Legion, the
Disabled American Veterans and the Veterans of Foreign Wars -- have complained
bitterly that the administration and the Republican leadership have abandoned a
commitment to treat VA health care as an integral "cost of war." The commander
in chief of the VFW, denounced Bush's spending proposals for the department as
"especially shameful during a time of war." The Senate vote was on a bill
sponsored by Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA.), who had opposed a past Democratic
amendment to raise VA spending. He was given the honor of becoming lead sponsor
because he faces one of the toughest reelection fights next year among incumbent
Republicans. The VA department had been planning to make up for the $1 billion
shortfall in medical care money for 2005 by transferring just under $400 million
from a special reserve fund and more than $600 million from a fund for
maintenance and equipment purchases. Many lawmakers voiced concern over these
planned transfers, contending that critical repairs would be postponed. [Source:
Washington Post Staff Writer Thomas Edsall article 30 JUN 05]
TSP UPDATE 02: The restrictions of having only two open seasons each year for
civilian and military members to sign up for, stop, resume or change their
Thrift Savings Plan contributions has ended.
Public Law 108-469 goes into effect 1 JUL 05, eliminating restrictions on
contribution elections that have always been tied to TSP open seasons. The
elimination of open seasons affects civilian and military members who are
eligible to contribute to TSP in the following ways:
-- Gives people more flexibility in managing their TSP contribution amounts
depending on their personal situations.
-- Civilians can now make 26 or 27 TSP contribution elections per year (based on
pay periods) and service members 24 per year.
-- Contribution elections submitted on or after 1 JUL will be effective at the
beginning of the pay period following the one in which the election is
submitted.
The contribution limits set for 2005 have not changed. Employees may continue to
contribute to TSP based on the system they are currently under for 2005 -- Civil
Service Retirement System, 10%; Federal Employees' Retirement System, 15%; or
the military pay system, 10%. The law eliminating open seasons does not
eliminate the waiting period that newly hired or rehired FERS employees not
previously eligible must serve before they can begin to receive agency
contributions. Participants who make an in-service financial hardship withdrawal
may not make TSP contribution elections for a six-month period following the
withdrawal. Information on the overall TSP is also available at www.tsp.gov.
[Source: Air Force Retiree News 29 JUN 05]
FLORIDA VETERANS HOMES: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) announced a
grant of more than $713,000 to renovate the Robert H. Jenkins Veteran's
Domiciliary. The grant will pay up to 65% of the cost for renovations at the
State Veteran's Domiciliary in Lake City. The overall cost of the project is
over $1 million. Florida provides the following assisted living and/or skilled
nursing facilities to veterans:
• Robert H. Jenkins Jr. Veterans' Domiciliary Home of Florida, 751 SE Sycamore
Terrace, Lake City, Florida 32025 Tel: (386)758-0600
• Douglas T. Jacobson State Veterans' Nursing Home, 21281 Grayton Terrace, Port
Charlotte, FL 33954 Tel: (941) 613-0919 or FAX: (941) 613-0935
• Clifford Chester Sims State Veterans' Nursing Home, 4419 Tram Rd, Springfield,
FL 32404 Tel: (850) 785-1678 or Fax: (850) 785-2237
• Emory L. Bennett Memorial State Veterans' Nursing Home, 1920 Mason Avenue,
Daytona Beach, FL 32117 Tel: (386)274-3460/61 or FAX: (386) 274-3487
• Baldomero Lopez State Veterans' Nursing Home, 6919 Parkway Blvd, Land-o-Lakes,
FL 34639 Tel: (813) 558-5000 or FAX (813) 558-5021
• Alexander “Sandy” Nininger State Veterans’ Nursing Home, 8401 West Cypress
Drive, Pembroke Pines, FL 33025 Tel: (954) 985-4824 or FAX (954) 985-4866
Any person interested in residency can be referred through a VA Medical Center.
Candidates must be veterans with qualifying war or peacetime service, be a
resident of Florida for one year immediately prior to applying for admission and
must require long-term care in a skilled nursing facility. For admission
information contact the nearest Florida County Veterans Service Office which can
be located at www.floridavets.org/organization/cvso.asp or Florida Department of
Veterans Affairs Office www.floridavets.org/organization/where.asp#medical.
Veterans with service-connected disabilities or veterans unable to afford
nursing home care will be considered first for residency. You are welcome to
contact the Admissions Coordinator for the Home in which you are interested for
additional information. Tours are always available. At www.floridavets.org/nursing/nursing.asp
a virtual tour of a State Veterans’ Nursing Home can be found. The tour includes
ten 360 degree fully interactive pictures that require no additional software to
view.
VA’s State Home Program is a partnership with the states to acquire, construct
or renovate nursing homes, domiciliaries and adult day health-care facilities
for veterans. The states own and operate the homes, but VA can provide up to 65%
percent of the cost of approved projects. When construction is complete and
inspections are satisfactory, the facilities qualify for per diem payments from
VA. In fiscal year 2004, VA spent over $4.6 billion in Florida to serve more
than 1.7 million veterans who live in the state. VA operates six medical centers
in Florida with outpatient clinics and Vet Centers in many communities.
Information about Florida’s Veterans Homes can be found on the Web at
www.floridavets.org/nursing/nursing.asp or by calling (850) 487-1533.[Source:
FDVA e-florida Newsletter 17 JUN 05]
SENIOR’S DISCOUNTS WEBSITE: If you don’t mind telling people that you qualify
for senior discounts, www.seniordiscounts.com can be a good resource for saving
on thousands of products and services including airlines, car rentals, travel,
sports, recreation, shopping, restaurants, national parks, medical services,
pharmacies, museums, and much more. The Web site also offers a free weekly
newsletter that focuses exclusively on senior discounts. When you log onto the
Web site, search by your zip code or city & state, and the category you’re
interested in. You will see a list that includes names and addresses, the amount
of the senior discount, and the minimum age requirement. It doesn’t promise the
best deals available, but the site is a good place to start. When you contact
any company, don’t hesitate to ask about special offers, closeouts, or
additional senior discounts that may be available. [Source:
www.seniordiscounts.com May 05]
COLON CANCER DETECTION: Cancer of the colon or rectum (Colorectal cancer) is the
second leading cancer killer in the United States after lung cancer. About
135,000 new cases are diagnosed each year and 55,000 deaths occur each year.
More than one-third of colorectal cancer deaths could be avoided if people over
50 had regular screening tests. Screening tests can help prevent colorectal
cancer by finding pre-cancerous polyps so they can be removed before they turn
into cancer. Most colorectal cancers begin as polyps. Polyps are growths on the
inner wall of the colon or rectum. People who have polyps or colorectal cancer
do not always have symptoms, especially at first. Screening tests are important
because they can find colorectal cancer early, when treatment works best. When
colorectal cancer is detected in the earliest stage of the disease (Stage 1),
the survival rate is 96%. The risk of developing colorectal cancer increases
with age. In fact, 92% occur in people 50 and older. Both sexes may develop this
cancer. Several different screening tests can be used to test for polyps or
colorectal cancer. Each can be used alone. Sometimes they are used in
combination with each other. Medicare Part B and TFL cover the following:
1. Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) or Stool Test - Covered once every 12 months.
You pay no coinsurance and no Part B deductible. This a test you do at home
using a test kit you get from your health care provider. You put stool samples
on test cards, then return the cards to the doctor or a lab. This test checks
for occult (hidden) blood in the stool.
2. Flexible Sigmoidoscopy (Flex Sig) - Covered once every 4 years. You pay 20%
of the Medicare approved amount after the yearly Part B deductible. If the
flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy is done in a hospital outpatient
department, you pay 25% of the Medicare-approved amount after the yearly Part B
deductible. This is a test in which the doctor puts a short, thin, flexible,
lighted tube into your rectum. The doctor checks for polyps or cancer in the
rectum and lower third of the colon. Sometimes a flexible sigmoidoscopy is used
in combination with a Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT).
3. Colonoscopy High Risk Individuals - If you are at high risk for colorectal
cancer, Medicare covers a colonoscopy or a barium enema every 2 years. You pay
20% of the Medicare approved amount after the yearly Part B deductible. Your
risk for colorectal cancer may be higher than average if you or a close relative
had colorectal polyps or cancer, or if you have inflammatory bowel disease.
4. Average Risk Individuals - If you are at average risk (i.e., not at high
risk) for colorectal cancer, Medicare will cover a colonoscopy every 10 years.
You pay 20% of the Medicare approved amount after the yearly Part B deductible.
However, if you are at average risk and have had a covered flexible
sigmoidoscopy, you must wait 4 years to be eligible for Medicare coverage of a
colonoscopy. This test is similar to a flexible sigmoidoscopy, except the doctor
uses a longer, thin, flexible, lighted tube to check for polyps or cancer in the
rectum and the entire colon. During the test, the doctor can find and remove
most polyps and some cancers.
5. Double Contrast Barium Enema - This test can substitute for a flexible
sigmoidoscopy or for a colonoscopy. This test is covered every 24 months if you
are at high risk for colorectal cancer and every 48 months if you aren't at high
risk. You pay 20% of the Medicare approved amount after the yearly Part B
deductible. A test in which you are given an enema with a liquid called barium.
The doctor takes x-rays of your colon. The barium allows the doctor to see the
outline of your colon, to check for polyps or other abnormalities.
Colonoscopy is an effective procedure to identity and remove polyps in the colon
before they become cancerous. It is often recommended if there is a change in
bowel habits, unexplained chronic diarrhea, constipation, abdominal pain, blood
in stools, anemia, or suspicion of colon polyps or cancer. Your colon must be
clean during the procedure to give the physician clear view. Typically, bowel
prep involves drinking a gallon of a special flavored laxative solution the
night before. An intravenous sedative and pain medication is given before the
procedure begins. Your doctor inserts a flexible fiber-optic tube called a
colonoscope into your rectum. It is about half an inch in diameter, as long as
the colon, and has a micro camera at the tip. Because of the medication, it is
practically painless. A small amount of air is used to expand the colon and make
it easier to see the colon wall. If polyps, other small growths, or abnormally
inflamed tissue is found thy often can be removed during the procedure for
further examination. A complete procedure takes about 45 minutes. “Virtual”
colonoscopies use CT scanning to get a visual image. They are faster and do not
require any sedative or pain medication. However, they require the same bowel
prep and involve the insertion of a tube into the rectum to blow in air to
expand the colon. They are expensive and cannot identify many smaller polyps. If
any are found a regular Colonoscopy is required for removal. Additional
information can be found at www.acg.gi.org. [Source: Military Officer Nov 04 &
MEDICARE web site www.medicare.gov/Health/ColonCancer.asp]
MOUSE FOR SHAKY HANDS: Tremors that cause shaky hands is common in our retiree
community. The International Essential Tremor Foundation (IETF) reports that
nearly 10 million people in the United States are affected by Essential Tremor,
the most common form of hand tremors. Parkinson's disease and several other
conditions can also cause tremors. When people with tremors try to use a
computer, their involuntary hand movements wreck havoc with the standard mouse
which interprets each movement as a planned event. A device call the Assistive
Mouse Adapter is now available to help computer users with shaky hands. This
adapter is a small rectangular device that is plugged in between the computer
and the mouse. The adapter functions like the stabilization in some camcorders
to filter out the shaky movements and is designed to work with any PC. The
device compensates for shaky movements and has a sensitivity setting that can be
adjusted according to tremor severity. It can also eliminate the multiple clicks
that a shaky hand might produce. For more information and a picture of the
device refer to www.montrosesecam.com. [Source: AARP News 22 Apr 05]
VA CLAIM FILING SOURCES: If you are a retiree with any injury or medical
condition that first manifested itself during military service and causes you to
be at least 10% disabled, you might be entitled to disability compensation from
the Department of Veterans Affairs. In addition, wartime retirees and veterans
with low incomes who are permanently and totally disabled, unable to work and
over age 65 may be eligible for monetary support through VA’s pension program.
In 2003, VA provided $26 billion in disability compensation, death compensation
and pension to 3.4 million people. About 2.8 million veterans received
disability compensation or pensions from VA. Also receiving benefits were
568,146 spouses, children and parents of deceased veterans. It s relatively easy
to file a disability claim; you can do it at any VA office or medical center.
Many cities also have Vet Centers where claims may be filed. Once approved,
veterans with service-connected disabilities receive priority access to care for
outpatient and hospitalization care. VA’s Readjustment Counseling Service has
operated its Vet Centers since 1979. It provides psychological counseling for
war-related trauma, community outreach, case management and referral activities,
plus supportive social services to veterans and family members. There are now
about 206 Vet Centers, and the system has served about 1.7 million veterans
since its inception. If you don’t live anywhere near a VA office, medical center
or Vet Center, you can file a disability claim online at http://vabenefits.vba.va.gov/vonapp/main.asp.
VA also offers comprehensive information about all its disability compensation
and pension benefits on its Web site at www.vba.va.gov/bln/21. If you do not
have computer access, you can call VA toll free at (800) 827-1000 for more
information.
Your DD214 discharge papers are the key to unlocking your veterans’ benefits.
Without them, you are virtually shut out until you can get an official copy from
the National Records Center, which can take weeks or months. If you plan to
retire from the military soon, you should ensure that your medical records,
personnel file and other important papers are updated with all the proper
documentation of any incurred injuries, illnesses or ongoing medical conditions.
Representatives of veterans’ service organizations are on duty at all VA offices
or clinics and can help you with disability claims. They can ensure that your
enrollment and claims forms are correctly filled out and that your claims are
processed right the first time. Many veterans’ service organizations are
federally chartered, recognized or approved by the secretary of Veterans
Affairs. These groups include the Veterans of Foreign Wars, Disabled American
Veterans and the American Legion, to name just a few. Representatives of these
organizations may prepare, present and prosecute VA claims. Each VSO’s service
officer will help prepare and manage your claims for benefits at no cost to you.
It’s their job and they have the expertise to assist. These service officers
also can function as advocates for you and your family in any appeals you make
with VA. And they will help you and your family in filing claims for
rehabilitation and education programs, pension and death benefits, employment
and training programs, Social Security disability benefits and many other
programs. If you plan to file a VA claim of any kind, make sure you keep copies
of everything that might be related to your claim inclusive of all your
correspondence and evidence. Remember, this is the government, and the
government needs its paperwork. VA review boards can only award veterans claims
based upon the documentation and evidence presented to them. It is your
responsibility as a veteran to ensure that your case has been thoroughly
reviewed. Laws change and if you are not eligible
to receive compensation today, you may be one day. There is no deadline for
applying for disability benefits, but approved VA claims are usually awarded
back to the date of filing, so it is important to file as soon as possible.
[Source: Navy times Alex Keenan article 25 JAN 05]
Lt. James "EMO" Tichacek, USN (Ret)
Director, Retiree Assistance Office, VITA & U.S. Embassy Warden Baguio City RP
PSC 517 Box RCB, FPO AP 96517-1000