RAO Bulletin
15 August 2008
Note: Anyone receiving this who does not want it request click on the
automatic delete tab at the end of the Bulletin or hit reply and place
the word "Remove" in the subject line!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THIS BULLETIN CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES
== Mobilized Reserve 13 AUG 08 ---------------- (1,106 Decrease)
== Will [02] --------------------------------- (What to Avoid)
== Tricare Deductible [01] ------------------------ (New Rule for RC)
== Medicare Part D [22] --------------- (Dual Eligible’s Drug Cost)
== Medicare Ambulance Coverage] ------ (What is/is not covered)
== Economic Stimulus Package [07] -------- (IRS Issues Reminder)
== Disabled Veterans Memorial [02] --------- ($86 Million Project)
== USERRA [06] --------------------- (Proposed Legislation)
== Death Gratuity [04] ------------ (Electronic Deposit Available)
== VA Use of Religion Lawsuit --------------- (No Legal Standing)
== Military Compensation Review [01] --- (Special/Incentive Pays)
== Military Compensation Review [02] ------- (Retirement System)
== Military Compensation Review [03] -------------------- (Tricare)
== Foreclosure [03] -------------------------- (Vet Protections)
== USFSPA & Divorce [02] --------------------- (Litigation Tactics)
== AO & Prostrate Cancer [01] ----------- (Exposure Double Risks)
== VA Mileage Reimbursement [05] ------ ($0.415/mile Proposed)
== Prostate Problems [06] --------------------- (Screening Age Limit)
== PTSD [23] ----------------------------- (SERV Act)
== VA COLA 2009 --------------------- (Senate Bill Passes)
== Veteran Legislation Status 13Aug 08 ------- (Where we Stand)
MOBILIZED RESERVE 13 AUG 08: The Army, Air Force and Marine Corps
announced the current number of reservists on active duty as of 13 AUG
08
in support of the partial mobilization. The net collective result is
1,106 fewer reservists mobilized than last reported in the Bulletin
for 1
AUG 08. At any given time, services may mobilize some units and
individuals while demobilizing others, making it possible for these
figures to
either increase or decrease. The total number currently on active duty
in support of the partial mobilization of the Army National Guard and
Army Reserve is 80,778; Navy Reserve, 5,799; Air National Guard and
Air
Force Reserve, 11,491; Marine Corps Reserve, 8096; and the Coast Guard
Reserve, 740. This brings the total National Guard and Reserve
personnel who have been mobilized to 106,904 including both units and
individual augmentees. A cumulative roster of all National Guard and
Reserve
personnel, who are currently mobilized, can be found at
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Aug2008//d20080813ngr.pdf .
[Source:
DoD News Release 691-08 13 Aug 08 ++]
WILL UPDATE 02: If not planned carefully a will (even if recently
updated) could have undesired consequences. Following are five flaws
that
could reshape your intended inheritances:
1. Not coordinating your will with other documents. Certain assets such
as retirement accounts and life insurance proceeds are not controlled
by your will and go, at your death, to the beneficiaries you named
either when you opened the account or when you last updated the
beneficiary
forms.
2. Not planning for the worst. What would happen if the people you have
named in your will die at the same time or shortly after you? By not
making alternate plans, your estate could end up in the hands of
people
you didn't anticipate.
3. Leaving too much to your spouse. If you have an estate worth more
than $2 million in 2008, your estate may pay more in estate taxes if
you
leave everything to your spouse. Take advantage of a tax-saving
tool—the bypass trust—which protects up to $2 million from being
taxed
twice, leaving more inheritance for your heirs.
4. Not leaving enough to a spouse. Most states will not allow you to
disinherit a spouse. In fact, typically he or she is entitled to
one-fourth to one-half of your estate, depending on your state's laws.
Check
with your estate planning attorney to make sure your spouse is
adequately
cared for.
5. Trying to control inheritance after you're gone. In some instances,
trying to motivate heirs by placing their inheritance in "family
incentive trusts" may backfire. The trust language needs to be
flexible
enough to accommodate emergencies or changes in circumstances,
avoiding
possible expensive legal recourse.
For more information on the above contact
shelleym@moaa.org. To learn
more about creating a will that meets your needs, consult an estate
planning attorney. [Source: MOAA News Exchange CAPT Shelley Marshall
article 13 Aug 08 ++]
TRICARE DEDUCTIBLE UPDATE 01: Families of some active-duty Reserve and
National Guard members will get a break on paying annual deductibles
associated with the military's health care system, according to a
final
rule (http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-18597.htm)
published 12
AUG in the Federal Register. The rule, which was proposed in AUG 06
and
took effect on 12 AUG makes permanent the Defense Department's
authority to waive the annual TRICARE deductibles for eligible
dependents of
reservists and Guard members who are called to active duty for more
than
30 days. It applies to those who choose to participate in TRICARE
Standard or Extra, rather than TRICARE Prime. By law, the TRICARE
Standard
(or Extra) deductible for active-duty family members is $150 per
individual and $300 per family each fiscal year. For those at the E-4
level
and below, the deductibles are $50 per individual and $100 per family.
Dependents are defined as spouses and children. In addition, the final
regulation increases the amount that can be billed to out-of-network
health care providers. "This helps reserve and Guard family members to
be
able to continue to see civilian providers with whom they have
established relations and promotes access and clinically appropriate
continuity
of care," the notice stated. The rule makes permanent authority
exercised by Defense through the extension of a demonstration project.
The
fiscal 2005 National Defense Authorization Act gave the department
that
authority and waived certain TRICARE deductibles for active-duty
members
of reserve components. The Federal Register notice stated that an
independent government estimate concluded that the annual cost for
implementing the rule would be less than $30 million. [Source:
GovExec.com Today
13 Aug 08 ++]
MEDICARE PART “D” UPDATE 22: A new report from the House
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform found that people who get
coverage
from both Medicare and Medicaid (a group sometimes called "dual
eligible"), pay 30% more for prescription drugs under the Medicare
prescription drug benefit (Part D) than they would if Medicaid paid
the bill.
According to the study released 25 JUL, this discrepancy in pricing
accounted for $3.7 billion in revenue for drug manufacturers during
the
first two years of the Part D program. The Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, which established the drug
benefit, required that Medicare Part D, not Medicaid, cover the cost
of
drugs for people with both Medicare and Medicaid. Many nursing-home
residents fall into this category. Democrats in the House say this
overpayment is an unjustified burden on the taxpayer, and they seek to
correct
the problem through new legislation. But House Republicans have
countered
that the new report overlooks important aspects and benefits to dual
eligibles contained in the Part D program. Under Part D, for example,
dual eligibles have access to a greater variety of prescription drugs.
[Source: Medicare Rights Center 12 Aug 08 ++]
MEDICARE AMBULANCE COVERAGE: If it is an emergency Medicare will
generally cover ambulance services, as long as an ambulance is the
only
safe way to transport you (medically necessary); and you are
transported
to and from certain locations. If covered, Medicare will pay for 80%
of
its approved amount for the ambulance service. You or your
supplemental insurance policy will be responsible for the remaining
20%. All
ambulance providers must accept Medicare assignment, meaning they must
accept the Medicare-approved amount as payment in full. If it is not
an
emergency, Medicare coverage of ambulance services is very limited. An
emergency is when your health is in serious danger and every second
counts
to prevent your health from getting worse. If the trip is scheduled as
a way to transport you from one location to another when your health
is not in immediate danger, it is not considered an emergency.
Medicare
will never pay for ambulette services (i.e. use of specially equipped
motor vehicles for transporting convalescing or handicapped people).
Also, lack of access to alternative transportation alone will not
justify
Medicare coverage. Medicare may cover non-emergency ambulance services
if:
You are confined to your bed (unable to get up from bed without help,
unable to walk, and unable to sit in a chair or wheelchair); or
You need vital medical services during your trip that are only
available in an ambulance, such as administration of medications or
monitoring
of vital functions; or
The hospital where you are receiving treatment is local, or is the
closest facility that can provide the treatment you need; or
The cost of bringing treatment to your home is less than the cost of
transporting you to the hospital and back by ambulance (for frequent
trips, Medicare may require proof that the regular ambulance trips are
more
appropriate than hospitalization); or
The ambulance meets Medicare requirements.
For Medicare to cover transportation by ambulance the
service must
be provided within your service area and be medically necessary. If
your service area does not have a facility that is adequately equipped
or
capable of treating you, transport to the closest appropriate facility
will be covered. The service area is the geographical region around a
facility that contains most of the patients whom the facility serves.
For example, if you live in a town with a small community hospital and
there is a larger urban hospital 20 miles away, the larger hospital
would be part of your service area if it regularly serves people who
live
in your town. To find out what facilities are in your service area,
contact your Medicare Part B carrier by calling 800-MEDICARE. Medicare
will
cover ambulance services to and from the following locations within
your service area:
From your home, or any other place where the need arose to the closest
appropriate hospital or skilled nursing facility (SNF).
From a hospital or SNF to your home if the facility is the closest
appropriate one in relation to your home.
From a SNF to the nearest medical provider, if the SNF cannot provide
you necessary treatment and the cost of transport is less then
bringing
the treatment to you, and back.
From your home to the nearest appropriate renal dialysis facility, and
back.
[Source: Medicare Rights Center 12 Aug 08 ++]
ECONOMIC STIMULUS PACKAGE UPDATE 07: The Internal Revenue Service
wants retirees and veterans to know that it is not too late to file
for an
economic stimulus payment. The IRS plans to send a second set of
information packets to 5.2 million people who may be eligible but who
have
not yet filed for their stimulus payment. The packages will contain
everything needed by a person who normally does not file a tax return
but
who must file this year in order to receive a payment of up to $300
—
$600 for those married and filing jointly. The deadline for filing for
the payment is 15 OCT. For more information call the rebate hot line
at
(866) 234-2942 or check the IRS Web site at www.irs.gov/newsroom/
[Source: Veterans Journal article 11 Aug 08 ++]
DISABLED VETERANS MEMORIAL UPDATE 02: Congress approved legislation
which the president signed into law requiring the U.S. Mint to issue
350,000 silver coins to raise money for a memorial near the U.S.
Capitol
honoring disabled veterans. Across Independence Avenue from the U.S.
Botanic Garden are two acres dedicated to the American Veterans
Disabled
for Life Memorial, but raising the $86 million for design,
construction,
maintenance and outreach has been a campaign for supporters. A $3
million pledge from H. Ross Perot earlier this year put the total
collected
near $70 million. The House and Senate authorized the minting of
350,000 $1 coins, which will be sold with a $10 surcharge. The
proceeds of
the surcharge will be paid directly to the Disabled Veterans' LIFE
Memorial Foundation. The foundation was incorporated in 1998, but
fundraising did not begin in earnest until 2002. The memorial will
honor 3
million veterans currently living with a disability as a result of
their
military service. The design, approved by the Commission of Fine Arts
in
2004, features a star-shaped reflecting pool, an everlasting flame and
grove of trees. The memorial is designed "not just to show all of the
veterans how much we care about them and honor them but also to remind
future Congresses that freedom is not free, that a price is very high
when
the president calls on our armed forces to deliver, and when they do,
we honor them and will always remember their memory," Rep. Mark Steven
Kirk, R-Ill., said recently on the House floor. The coins will be
issued in 2010, weigh 26.73 grams, be 1.5 inches in diameter and
contain 90%
silver and 10% copper. For more information refer to
http://www.avdlm.org.
[Source: EANGUS Minuteman Update 7 Aug 08 ++]
USERRA UPDATE 06: Senators Robert Casey (D-PA), Edward Kennedy (D-MA)
and Barack Obama (D-IL) and have sponsored S.3432, the Servicemembers'
Access to Justice Act, with a House companion bill expected soon,
which
would eliminate state sovereign immunity and make states subject to
USERRA claims if they receive any federal financial assistance for any
program or activity. The bill would also provide enhanced USERRA
remedies
against state, federal and/or private employers for violating USERRA,
including damages plus interest for lost wages or actual monetary
losses where wages have not been denied; liquidated damages equal to
the
wages or other monetary loss or $10,000, whichever is greater. Members
with claims against state and private employers would be entitled to a
jury trial and to punitive damages in the case of an employer of 25 or
more employees whose violation was done with malice or reckless
indifference to the rights of the servicemember. Successful claimants
would
mandatorily be awarded attorney fees acquired in fighting for their
USERRA
rights.
The Uniformed Services Employment and Re-employment
Rights Act
protects family and medical leave rights of reservists and guardsmen.
Under the Act any person called up for military service has certain
rights
in the civilian workplace. Every employer, from the biggest of
corporations to small businesses, must comply. The act covers people
who’ve
been absent from work because of:
Active duty.
Active duty for training.
Inactive duty training.
Full-time National Guard duty.
An examination to determine fitness for any of the types of duty
mentioned above.
Funeral honors duty performed by National Guard or reservists.
Employers must extend USERRA provisions to anyone in the Army, Navy,
Marine Corps, Air Force or Coast Guard; Reserves and National Guard;
Commissioned Corps of the Public Health Service; or any other group of
people designated by the president. For more information on the USERRA
refer to www.dol.gov/vets. [Source: NGAUS Leg Up 8 AUG 08]
DEATH GRATUITY UPDATE 04: Death gratuity checks worth $100,000 can now
be deposited electronically. The new measure, which took effect 4 AUG,
makes the funds available to grieving family members within 24 hours.
Service personnel designate who they want to receive the funds on
their
Page 2 information. “We want to make those funds available,” said
Lt. Karen Eifert, a Navy spokeswoman at the Pentagon. Previously, the
death gratuity checks were only available in paper form, often
delivered
during a visit from a casualty assistance calls officer. Eifert said
it could take days or weeks for the funds to clear, resulting,
according
to recent news reports, in families not having money available for
funeral services while banks held up the funds. In one case, a man was
jailed over a dispute with his son’s check. “That’s what sprang
us
into action, to make things easier for families that are grieving,”
she said. “We recommend they take the electronic funds transfer.”
The
$100,000 death gratuity is wholly separate from group life insurance
available to military members, she noted. The Navy follows the Army,
Air
Force and Marine Corps in offering the electronic check to its
members. Paper checks will still be available should sailors choose
that
option. [Source: NavyTimes article posted 7 Aug 08 ++]
VA USE OF RELIGION LAWSUIT: An appeals court has ruled taxpayers
cannot sue the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs for incorporating
religion into its health care programs for the nation's veterans.
The
Chicago-based 7th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 5 AUG that the
Madison-based
Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFFF) and three of its members have
no legal standing to bring the case. The group was trying to end the
agency's practice of asking patients about their religion in
"spiritual
assessments," its use of chaplains to treat patients, and drug and
alcohol treatment programs that incorporate religion. It claimed those
practices violated the separation of church and state. But the court
ruled
that federal taxpayers cannot challenge those expenditures. It cited a
U.S. Supreme Court decision from last year in which the same group was
not allowed to sue over President Bush’s faith-based initiative. In
that case, the court ruled 5-4 that taxpayers cannot sue the executive
branch for expenses that allegedly promote religion. Cases can only be
brought when the questionable expenditures are explicitly authorized
in a
Congressional spending bill, the court ruled. Congress never
authorized spending on the chaplain services, pastoral care and other
programs
challenged, the 7th Circuit ruled.
Annie Laurie Gaylor, the group's co-president,
criticized the
ruling but said an appeal to the Supreme Court was unlikely. She said
the
group would look for VA patients who object to their treatment to be
potential plaintiffs but said such a case would still be difficult to
win.
"The courts are moving to the position where government can fund
religious activities and endorse religion without restraint," she
said.
"It's really very disturbing." The appeals court decision is the
latest in
a string of similar rulings since the Supreme Court decision, George
Washington University law professor Ira Lupu said. Federal courts have
dismissed cases challenging legislative prayer in Indiana and the
placement of children in religious foster homes in Kentucky and North
Dakota,
he said. "There's quite a powerful trend here in the courts to take
the
Supreme Court's decision and really run with it," he said. "I have not
yet seen one case where people have brought up this standing issue
where the government has lost and the taxpayers have won. Every single
one
has been thrown out. This is really quite significant."
Veterans Affairs lawyers did not challenge the group's
ability to
sue before the Supreme Court decision, and U.S. District Judge John
Shabaz dismissed the case on its merits last year. He ruled the VA's
programs integrate religion and spirituality but are legal because
they are
voluntary and serve valid secular purposes such as helping patients.
The foundation appealed, and government lawyers challenged its ability
to
sue after the Supreme Court decision came down. The veterans agency,
which treated 5.3 million people at its facilities in 2005, says it
believes spirituality should be integrated into care, but it allows
patients to decide whether that involves religion. Its spiritual
assessments
ask patients a series of questions about their faith, such as how
often
they attend church and how important religion is in their lives.
Agency
officials say the assessments help them determine patients' needs.
[Source: Chicago Tribune AP Ryan J. Foley article 6 Aug 08 ++]
MILITARY COMPENSATION REVIEW UPDATE 01: The 10th Quadrennial Review of
Military Compensation has suggested a new way of measuring military
pay, proposed that more money be spent on special and incentive pays,
and
recommended restructuring the basic allowance for housing. Retired Air
Force Brig. Gen. Jan D. “Denny” Eakle -- former deputy director of
the Defense Finance and Accounting Service -- chaired the commission
and briefed the media on the recommendations 12 MAR. This was just
the
first release of the review, Eakle explained. A second volume,
covering
retirement and quality-of-life aspects of compensation, will be
released in the summer. Eakle said that whenever a QRMC convenes, the
first
question it examines always is whether military pay is comparable to
pay
in the private sector. The second is whether military pay is adequate
to maintain the force, she said. The 9th QRMC, released in 2002,
concluded that for pay to be comparable, it had to be at or above the
70th
percentile of the age- and education-matched civilian population,
Eakle
said. Military pay followed this guidance through 2006, and targeted
pay raises in 2007 and 2008 ensure DoD exceeds the 70th percentile for
enlisted personnel. Officer pay exceeded this goal in 2006 and has
kept
pace since then, she said.
Eakle said the current review studied whether the
comparability
formula is adequate. “Basically, what we wanted to do is create
something which would give military members a better means of
assessing how
their pay stacked up in comparison to civilians,” she said. Regular
military compensation was the measure used in previous QRMCs. This
included basic pay, subsistence, housing and a measure of savings on
federal
income tax. “But there's a lot more to military compensation,” she
said. The new system begins with regular military compensation and
adds
state and FICA tax advantages. Military personnel also do not pay
out-of-pocket health care costs, such as co-pays, she explained, and
all
these folded into the panel’s calculations. The new measurement is
called military annual compensation, and it sets the 80th percentile
as the
standard for military compensation comparability with the private
sector. Pay for enlisted personnel and officers meets this standard,
Eakle
said. Congress revamped the special incentive pay categories from more
than 60 to eight, Eakle said. “That, in fact, was a recommendation
of
this QRMC, and it was enacted before the publication of this document,
Eakle said. “And so now it's up to the department to begin the
process of drafting out the instructions to adopt this.” The review
recommended increasing the size of the special and incentive pay
budget.
“Today we have an S&I budget that, quite frankly, is rather
small in
comparison to the size of the other pay accounts,” she said. “And
because of that, it doesn't give the service as much flexibility for
arranging pay.”
The review examined the basic allowance for housing and
a previous
recommendation to do away with the without-dependent housing rate. The
review also proposed changes to the partial-BAH program. Because some
single servicemembers are making as little as 52% of the pay their
peers who have families receive, the QRMC recommends raising that
floor to
no less than 75% at first, and to 95% over time. But the gap between
married and single BAH should not disappear, Eakle said. The review
did
recommend changes for singles living on post or aboard ships. The
proposal is a new variable, partial BAH based on the value of the
quarters
the servicemembers occupy. The DoD standard is a one-plus-one
dormitory
-- meaning each individual having a bedroom and a shared cooking
facility and bathroom. For those living with three roommates, the
review
believes they are overpaying for their accommodations by forfeiting
their
entire housing allowance, and “we would recommend that they get a
rebate on their BAH.” “The range we are talking about is going
from
zero for people in the one-plus-one dormitories, up to a 25% rebate
for
those who are living in ships with hot-bunk arrangements,” she said.
“So you'd be able to give people something in recognition of the
fact
that housing is not at the DoD standard.”
The review also recommended staying with
time-in-service pay
tables. A previous commission, the Defense Advisory Committee on
Military
Compensation, recommended replacing the time-in-service pay table with
a
time-in-grade pay table. This would reward pay for performance, the
commission members believed. “We looked very seriously at this
recommendation, but we've chosen not to accept it and are not going to
endorse
the change,” Eakle said. She said it would exacerbate pay
differentials, adding: “We don't think that's in keeping with our
spirit of being
fair and equitable to all members.” [Source: AFPS Jim Garamone
article 13 Mar 08 ++]
MILITARY COMPENSATION REVIEW UPDATE 02: A panel looking at military
compensation has recommended dramatic changes in the military
retirement
system. The recommendations are part of the second volume put out by
the 10th Quadrennial Review of Military Compensation. The first
volume
-- released in March -- looked at cash compensation. Retired Air Force
Brig. Gen. Jan D. "Denny" Eakle was director of the panel, and she
briefed the press during a Pentagon news conference 5 AUG. Eakle said
critics of the current military retirement system say it is not
equitable,
it is not flexible, and it is not efficient. "There is a perception
that the system we have today is inequitable because only 15% of all
enlisted personnel and less than half of officers will ever receive
anything in the system," she said. Reserve-component personnel also
believe
the current system discriminates against them, especially at a time
when
reserve forces are being called on more, she said.
The retirement proposal would offer a defined benefit,
defined
contributions, "gate" pays and separation pays. The defined benefit
would
be 2.5% of the average basic pay for the highest 36 months of the
individual's career multiplied by the number of years of service, with
servicemembers vested at 10 years of service. Payments to retirees
would
begin at age 60 for those with less than 20 years of service and at
age
57 for those with 20 years of service or more. Servicemembers could
opt
for an immediate annuity, but the payout would follow the Federal
Employee Retirement System methodology -- a 5% penalty per year for
early
withdrawal. The defined contribution portion would be an automatic
government-funded Thrift Savings Plan. Servicemembers would not have
to
match any government payment. The government would not put any money
in for
the first year, but would put in 2% of base pay for two years of
service, 3% for three and four years of service, and 5% for five and
more
years of service. Again, this would be vested after 10 years of
service.
The military also would make "gate pays" to
servicemembers who
reach specific years of service. These would vary by years of service
and
skills, Eakle said. "This is a payment made for achieving a
particular
year of service," she explained. "And within the services, they would
have the flexibility to vary this by year of service as well as by
skill. That way, they could begin to shape the skills by dragging
people
further into their career by offering them an incentive." Finally,
the
system would include separation pays to servicemembers that would also
vary by years of service and skills. "The separation payments would be
made available by the service to members that they wished to entice to
leave," Eakle said. This would be a permanent tool services would have
available, she added.
The panel used a Rand Corporation computer model to
test the
recommendations, but Eakle said the panel members would like a
large-scale
test in the Defense Department. "Therefore, the recommendation of this
QRMC is that the Department of Defense conducts a multi-year test of
this system. The way the test would work is this: All four services
would
be asked to identify some skills that have different types of
retention
patterns -- some that stay not very long, some that stay longer
periods of time -- and ones they wish to influence. The test would
offer
people in those skills in the first eight years of service an
opportunity
to volunteer. If someone was selected for the test, they would be
paid
all of the TSP that they should have earned up until that point, and
it
will be put in their TSP account for them. The program's vesting rules
would in fact apply to all those individuals. So should they achieve
10 years of service while they are in the test, they would fully own
it.
At the end of the test period, people who are in the new system who
wish to revert to the original retirement system would be allowed to
do
so.” she said. Any change in the retirement system would require
action by Congress. DoD officials said they will carefully examine the
panel's recommendations and then decide if they should move forward.
The
study will take at least six to 12 months, so any decision would be
made
by the next administration, DoD officials added. [Source: AFPS Jim
Garamone article 5 Aug 08 ++]
MILITARY COMPENSATION REVIEW UPDATE 03: The Quadrennial Review of
Military Compensation has recommended fee changes to Tricare, the
military's health care system. The recommendations would mostly affect
retirees
and will not affect active-duty servicemembers or their dependents,
retired Air Force Brig. Gen. Jan D. "Denny" Eakle, the director of the
study, said in a Pentagon briefing today. "Retiree fees ought to
relate to
how much the plan is worth. The ... higher-value plans should have
higher premiums associated with them. The panel believes fees need to
be
fair to all retired military members. They ought to reflect how much
income an individual has, so that if they make more money and are
therefore better able to pay for a system, they should do so," she
said. One
problem is the fee structure for Tricare has not changed in 13 years.
In
1995, servicemembers paid 27% of their health care cost. Today that
share is less than 12%. Over-65 military retirees -- those using the
"Tricare for Life" program -- have been paying the Medicare Part B
program
fee of 25%, but this is due to rise. "Essentially what this says to
you is that we are asking our older retirees, who are in fact the
least
likely to hold jobs and therefore have the lowest incomes, to pay the
most for their system," Eakle said.
But Tricare for Life is a much more generous program
than Tricare
Prime. Eakle said, "We believe we need to get some parity between our
older and our younger retirees. The panel wants to redress some of
this
imbalance. We believe that the under-65 retirees should begin paying
40% of the Medicare Part B premium using the same fee structure that
is
laid on by the Medicare system, adding that this should bring the
system into a semblance of parity. In addition, we believe that the
under-65
retirees ... who elect to use Tricare Standard and Extra need to pay a
small fee for that. And we would suggest to the department that that
fee be set at 15% of the Medicare Part B. We think the family rate
should be set at double the individual rate and that the premium
increase
needs to be phased in over four years." Other recommendations
include
using the Medicare deductible rate -- $135 per person in 2008 -- for
Tricare. The panel also recommended to the department that all co-pays
and
co-insurance for any preventative service be provided at no cost to
all
members and retirees who have access to Tricare. The final panel
recommendation to DoD is to establish an open enrollment period for
Tricare,
Eakle said. [Source: AFPS Jim Garamone article 5 Aug 08 ++]
FORECLOSURE UPDATE 03: “The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of
2008”, H.R.3221 was recently signed into law (PL 110-289). To
review
the full law, go to:
http://thomas.loc.gov/ and type HR 3221 into the
search field. This legislation is designed to help homeowners keep
their
existing homes and provide first-time buyers access to affordable
housing. Military families should know that there are several
provisions
within the Act that uniquely impact service members and veterans. The
law
will:
Exclude military housing allowances from counting as income when
service members try to qualify for low-income housing;
Expand the foreclosure protection for service members returning from
deployment. Previously, service members had 90 days of protection from
foreclosure, now they have nine months. This temporary protection
expires
on December 31, 2010;
Provide a temporary increase until the end of the year for the maximum
loan guaranteed by the Department of Veteran Affairs (VA). The cap can
be as high as $720,750 and as low as $417,000 depending on the median
housing prices for the area;
Require the Secretary of Defense to develop a program to provide
financial counseling to returning service members, including credit
and home
mortgage counseling;
Provide a moving benefit to service members who are forced to move out
of rental housing if the owner of the housing is foreclosed on;
Increase grants for severally disabled veterans from $50,000 to
$60,000;
Make totally disabled service members held on active duty for medical
reasons eligible for VA grants for home alternations before their
discharge;
Extend grants for specially adapted housing and assistance to veterans
with severe burns and veterans residing outside the United States; and
Allow veteran benefits received as a lump sum to be treated as monthly
benefits for the purposes of eligibility for Section 8 Housing
assistance.
[Source: NMFA Government and You E-News 12 Aug 08 ++]
USFSPA & DIVORCE UPDATE 02: The USFSPA Litigation Support Group
(ULSG) closely monitors cases filed in state courts where former
servicemembers, who are receiving military retirement pay, are locked
in disputes
with former spouses when that pay is converted, by election, to
military disability pay under applicable VA benefits. This is a common
move by
former servicemembers who receive a VA disability rating because of
the tax advantages of receiving disability pay over retired pay.
Former
spouses usually dispute such an election and demand that foregone
share of military retired pay be rendered to them, even though the
former
servicemember's only (or major) source of income is now disability
pay.
Usually, former servicemembers (and their lawyers) rely solely on the
provisions of the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act
(USFSPA) which prevents the treatment of military disability pay as
disposable pay for purposes of payments to former spouses. See
USFSPA, 10
U.S.C. § 1408(a)(4)(B). But state courts continue to ignore that
provision and rule against the interests of former servicemembers.
It is vital, therefore, that ULSG members and
constituents also
rely on the relevant provisions of the Veterans' Benefits Act, 38
U.S.C.
§ 5301, which provides that payments of benefits due or to become due
under any law administered by the Secretary [of Veterans Affairs]
shall
not be assignable except to the extent specifically authorized by law,
and such payments made to, or on account of, a beneficiary shall be
… exempt from the claim of creditors, and shall not be liable to
attachment, levy, or seizure by or under any legal or equitable
process
whatever, either before or after receipt by the beneficiary. Congress
recently amended the VBA and this applicable provision Id. §
5301(a)(1). ,
to clarify that, in any case where a beneficiary entitled to
compensation, pension, or dependency and indemnity compensation enters
into an
agreement with another person under which agreement such other person
acquires for consideration the right to receive such benefit by
payment
of such compensation, pension or dependency and indemnity
compensation,
as the case may be … such agreement shall be deemed to be an
assignment and is prohibited. Veterans Benefits Act of 2003, Pub. L.
No.
108-183, § 702, 117 Stat. 2651, Dec. 16, 2003, codified at §
5301(a)(3)(A).
ULSG members finding themselves in litigation on questions
related
to this advisory should instruct their lawyers to brief and argue –
from the very beginning of the case, and at every opportunity
thereafter
– the Veterans Benefits Act (VBA) issue, in support of their
position. While ULSG, LLC cannot provide individualized legal advice
to
its members and constituents, or answer individual queries, ULSG
leadership believes that this is a prudent course to follow in cases
such as
this. ULSG would appreciate hearing reports on this issue from those
concerned. They can be reached at
Leadership@ulsg.org or by mail to
ULSG,
LLC, 20770 US Hwy 281, Ste 108-12, San Antonio, Texas 78258-7500.
[Source: ULSG Advisory 5 Aug 08 ++]
AO & PROSTRATE CANCER UPDATE 01: Veterans exposed to the herbicide
Agent Orange are twice as likely to get prostate cancer as other
veterans,
UC Davis researchers found in a study published online by the journal
Cancer. Prostate cancer in those men also comes on earlier and is more
aggressive, said Dr. Karim Chaime, chief resident in urology at UC
Davis and the study's lead author. The findings are a clear signal
that men
who worked with Agent Orange should be cared for differently, getting
earlier biopsies and more aggressive treatment, he said. "This is a
high-risk group." Chaime described the study of more than 13,000
Northern
California veterans over eight years as "the biggest study ever done"
on Agent Orange effects. It will be published in the 15 SEP print
edition of Cancer, after online publication last week, and Chaime
hopes it
soon could lead to new Department of Veterans’ Affairs treatment
standards.
For Vietnam vet James McKasson, who participated in the
study, the
findings are a reminder that no one exposed to Agent Orange should
delay prostate-cancer testing. McKasson, 62, a retired auto mechanic,
said
he's doing well after being diagnosed with prostate cancer last year
– 40 years after he helped load Agent Orange onto planes in the
1960s.
He worked with both liquid and powdered forms of the chemical, and
"this stuff would slop around; it would drip on you," he recalled.
"You'd
walk through it and get it on your shoes, on your clothes, on your
hands. … They didn't give us any protective clothing at all." For
decades, McKasson didn't worry much about studies that linked exposure
to
diseases ranging from diabetes to soft-tissue cancer to birth defects
in
veterans' children. "I'm an advocate now," he said, telling his
"stubborn" friends to have regular checks for prostate cancer.
The chemical was used widely during the Vietnam War to
defoliate
jungle areas where U.S. forces believed enemies were hiding. It also
was
used around U.S. military facilities at home and abroad as early as
the 1950s, according to the Department of Veterans Affairs. About
375,000
men nationwide are on the military's Agent Orange registry of those
exposed, and roughly one-third can be expected to develop prostate
cancer, Chaime said. "This has huge implications for men, especially
in the
VA," but also for those treated by private insurance, whose primary
care
doctors and urologists may not have seen the latest data, he added. Of
the 13,000 men followed by the study, just under half had been exposed
to Agent Orange. Among the 6,214 exposed, 239 were diagnosed with
prostate cancer over eight years, compared with 124 of 6,930 unexposed
veterans. [Source: The Sacramento Bee Carrie Peyton Dahlberg article
5 Aug
08 ++]
VA MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT UPDATE 05: The House overwhelmingly
approved
a bill that—among other things—would increase the mileage
compensation paid by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) by nearly
50% to
help vets who have to drive long distances to receive medical care.
The
increase in mileage compensation—to 41.5 cents per mile—was
included in the Fiscal Year 2009 Military Construction and Veterans
Affairs
Appropriations Act, which must still be considered by the Senate and
approved by President Bush, said House Appropriations Committee
Chairman
Dave Obey (D-WI). The spending bill—which passed 409 to 4—would
provide $336 million above Bush’s FY 2009 budget request for
servicemember
quality-of-life projects to improve living conditions and health care
delivery. Projects include the modernization of training facilities,
as
well as the building of child care centers, barracks and housing, Obey
said. The bill also would address the backlog in maintenance at VA
medical facilities; improve access to health care for vets in areas
where
VA does not offer services; increase availability of new generation
prosthetics; substantially increase funding for research into trauma,
mental health and other critical areas; and provide additional case
workers
and medical services for homeless vets. [Source: Rep. Dave Obey press
release 1 Aug 08 ++]
PROSTATE PROBLEMS UPDATE 06: In a move that could lead to significant
changes in medical care for older men, a national task force in the
United States recommended that doctors stop screening men ages 75 and
older for prostate cancer because the search for the disease in this
group
is causing more harm than good. The new guidelines, issued 4 AUG by
the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, represent an abrupt policy
change by an influential panel that had withheld any advice regarding
screening for prostate cancer, citing a lack of reliable evidence.
Though the
task force still has not taken a stand on the value of screening in
younger men, the shift is certain to re-ignite the debate about the
appropriateness of prostate cancer screening at any age. Screening
for
prostate cancer is typically performed with a blood test measuring
prostate-specific antigen, or PSA, levels. Because it is not clear
precisely
what PSA level signals the presence of cancer, many men experience
stressful false alarms that lead to unnecessary surgical biopsies to
make a
definitive diagnosis, which can be painful and in rare cases can cause
serious complications. Widespread PSA testing has led to high rates of
prostate cancer detection. Last year, more than 218,000 men in the
United States were found to have the disease. About 28,000 die of it,
making it the most common cancer and second-leading cancer killer
among
men.
Various studies suggest the disease is "over-diagnosed"
- that is,
detected at a point when the disease probably would not affect life
expectancy - in 29 to 44% of cases. Prostate cancer often progresses
very
slowly, and a large number of these cancers discovered through
screening probably will never cause symptoms during the patient's
lifetime,
particularly if that patient is older. At the same time, aggressive
treatment of prostate cancer can greatly reduce a patient's quality of
life, resulting in complications like impotence and incontinence.
Past
task force guidelines noted that there was no benefit to prostate
cancer
screening in men with less than 10 years left to live. Since it can be
difficult to assess life expectancy, it was an informal recommendation
that had limited impact on screening practices. The new guidelines
take
a more definitive stand; however, stating that the age of 75 is
clearly
the point at which screening is no longer appropriate. The task force
was created by Congress to analyze current medical research and to
make recommendations about preventive care for healthy people. Its
guidelines are viewed as highly credible and often are relied on by
practicing
physicians in making decisions about patient care. It is estimated
that one out of every three American men 75 and older is now screened
for
prostate cancer. [Source: International Herald tribune Tara
Parker-Pope article 5 Aug 08 ++]
PTSD UPDATE 23: In response to the growing number of veterans denied
the mental health treatment needed to address their post traumatic
stress who end up in legal trouble after self-medicating to suppress
their
anxieties, Sens. John Kerry (D-MA) and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK)on 1 AUG
introduced the Services, Education, and Rehabilitation for Veterans
(SERV)
Act to create veteran drug treatment courts to support veterans combat
the cycle of alcohol or drug addiction. A similar program is
operational in Buffalo, NY and has already seen great success. The
SERV Act
would authorize funds to go to the Office of National Drug Control
Policy
for the development and implementation of veteran’s treatment courts
or to enhance operational drug courts to serve veterans. The grants
would be administered by the Department of Justice in consultation
with the
Department of Veterans Affairs. To be eligible for funding the
veteran’s treatment court or drug court serving veterans must
effectively
integrate substance abuse treatment, mental health treatment,
mandatory
drug testing, sanctions and incentives, and transitional services in a
judicially supervised court setting with jurisdiction over nonviolent,
substance-abusing offenders that have served in the United States
military. Also included is the authorization for the National Drug
Court
Institute (NDCI). The NDCI is a bipartisan supported organization that
conducts national, comprehensive training programs for State and local
communities for the purpose of improving the professional skills of
drug
court practitioners and enhancing the ability of State and local
communities to expand drug courts to reach all addicted citizens in
need
“These treatment courts will address the specific
challenges
with drugs and alcohol too many veterans face when returning home from
their honorable service overseas,” said Senator John Kerry. “For
those
who have given so much for our country, we should address the serious
issues of drug and alcohol addiction in an appropriate forum that
recognizes that some veterans fall victim to substance abuse as a way
to
handle post-traumatic stress. It’s well past time we offered our
veterans services worthy of their sacrifice.” Sen. Murkowski said,
“Some
of the brave men and women who have served our country fall victim to
alcohol and drug addiction and end up in our criminal justice system.
Drug courts are an effective way to break this cycle of abuse and help
these veterans re-enter society. The Alaska Court System already has
successful drug courts in Anchorage, Fairbanks, Bethel, Juneau and
Ketchikan, and there is a Veterans Court in Anchorage. This bill would
provide
additional funding for some of Alaska’s existing therapeutic court
programs and would allow more nonviolent-offender programs to be
developed
across the state. The SERV Act is particularly important for Alaska,
which has one of the highest veterans’ per capita rates in the
nation.” [Source: Military.com AP article 1 Aug 08 ++]
VA COLA 2009: S.2617, the Veterans Compensation Cost-of-Living
Adjustment Act of 2008 intoduced by Senator Akaka, was passed by
unanimous
consent in the Senate 30 JUL. If passed in the House, it will adjust
veterans' compensation rates to keep pace with inflation effective 1
DEC
08. According to recent data provided by the Department of Veteran
Affairs this increase will go to 2.8 million veterans and over 300,000
surviving spouses receiving dependency and indemnity compensation. The
bill
now moves to the House of Representativess for their consideration.
While this year's cost-of-living increase has yet to be determined,
the
congressional Budget Office has projected a 2.8% increase. Last
year's
increase was 2.3% [source: Sen. Akaka press release 21 Jun 08 +]
HAVE YOU HEARD: Ways to Simulate Being in The Navy if you are a
Retired Destroyer Sailor:
Lock all friends and family outside. Your only means of communication
should be with letters that your neighbors have held for at least
three
weeks, discarding two of five.
Surround yourself with 200 people that you don’t really know or like:
people who smoke, snore like Mack trucks going uphill, and use foul
language like a child uses sugar on cereal.
Unplug all radios and TVs to completely cut you off from the outside
world. Have a neighbor bring you a Time, Newsweek, or Proceedings
from
five years ago to keep you abreast of current events.
Monitor all home appliances hourly, recording all vital information
(ie: plugged in, lights come on when doors open, etc).
Do not flush the toilet for five days to simulate the smell of 40
people using the same commode.
Lock the bathroom twice a day for a four hour period.
Wear only military uniforms. Even though nobody cares, clean and press
one dress uniform and wear it for 20 minutes.
Cut your hair weekly, making it shorter each time, until you look bald
or look like you lost a fight with a demented sheep.
Work in 19-hour cycles, sleeping only four hours at a time, to ensure
that your body does not know or even care if it is day or night.
Listen to your favorite CD 6 times a day for two weeks, then play music
that causes acute nausea until you are glad to get back to your
favorite CD.
Cut a twin mattress in half and enclose three sides of your bed. Add a
roof that prevents you from sitting up (about 10 inches is a good
distance) then place it on a platform that is four feet off the floor.
Place a small dead animal under the bed to simulate the smell of your
bunkmate’s socks.
Set your alarm to go off at 10 minute intervals for the first hour of
sleep to simulate the various times the watchstanders and night crew
bump around and wake you up. Place your bed on a rocking table to
ensure
you are tossed around the remaining three hours. Make use of a
custom
clock that randomly simulates fire alarms, police sirens, helicopter
crash alarms, and a new-wave rock band.
Have week old fruit and vegetables delivered to your garage and wait
two weeks before eating them.
Prepare all meals blindfolded using all the spices you can grope for,
or none at all. Remove the blindfold and eat everything in three
minutes.
Periodically, shut off all power at the main circuit breaker and run
around shouting “fire, fire, fire” and then restore power.
At least once a month, force the commode to overflow to simulate a
‘black water system’ boo-boo.
Buy a gas mask and smear it with rancid animal fat. Scrub the face
shield with steel wool until you can no longer see out of it. Wear
this
for two hours every fifth day especially when you are in the bathroom.
Study the owner’s manual for all household appliances. Routinely
take an appliance apart and put it back together.
Remove all plants, pictures and decorations. Paint everything gray,
white, or the shade of hospital smocks.
Buy 50 cases of toilet paper and lock up all but two rolls. Ensure one
of these two rolls is wet all the time.
Smash your forehead or shins with a hammer every two days to simulate
collision injuries sustained onboard Navy ships.
When making sandwiches, leave the bread out for six days, or until it
is hard and stale.
Every 10 weeks, simulate a visit to another port. Go directly to the
city slums wearing your best clothes. Find the worst looking place,
and
ask for the most expensive beer that they carry. Drink as many as
you
can in four hours. Take a cab home taking the longest possible
route.
Tip the cabby after he charges you double because you dress funny and
don’t speak right.
Use fresh milk for only two days after each port visit.
Keep the bedroom thermostat at 2 deg C and use only a thin blanket for
warmth.
Ensure that the water heater is connected to a device that provides
water at a flow rate that varies from a fast drip to a weak trickle,
with
the temperature alternating rapidly from -2 to 95 deg C.
Use only spoons which hold a minimum of ½ cup at a time.
Repaint the interior of your home every month, whether it needs it or
not.
Remind yourself every day: “It’s not just a job, it’s an
adventure!”
Mix kerosene with your water supply to simulate the de-sal plant on the
ship picking up jp5 in the intake—if a lit match thrown into your
coffee pot doesn’t ignite it, add more kerosene.
Stand outside at attention at dawn and have the poorest reader you know
read the morning paper out loud. Be sure to have him skip over
anything pertinent.
Every four hours, check the fluid level in your car’s radiator.
Check the tire pressure and replace air lost from excessive pressure
checks. Be sure to place red tag on ignition stating “DANGER:
DO
NOT
OPERATE” while you perform these checks. Inform your neighbor as to
the
results of these checks, have him tell you to repeat the checks
because
he did not see you perform them.
Paint your house gray (exterior) include windows except for rooms you
do not frequent, paint your car gray, paint your driveway a different
shade of gray.
Wait outside your dining area as a family member eats a meal, then have
that person serve you a meal prepared several hours earlier.
Shut all blinds and doors at sunset.
Clean your house ‘till there’s absolutely not a speck of dust
anywhere.
Call on a stranger to come inspect your house. Ensure stranger sees
dust that has collected in the time it took to find him. Stranger
cannot
leave until he finds irrational fault with your house/belongings.
Hang Christmas lights in June. When the neighbors ask, say,
“deceptive lighting.”
Hang white lights when relatives visit. When neighbors ask, say,
“friendship lights.”
VETERAN LEGISLATION STATUS 13 AUG 08: Congress is in recess 6 AUG to
4 SEP. Refer to the Bulletin’s House & Senate attachments for or
a
listing of Congressional bills of interest to the veteran community
that
have been introduced in the 110th Congress. Support of these bills
through cosponsorship by other legislators is critical if they are
ever
going to move through the legislative process for a floor vote to
become
law. A good indication on that likelihood is the number of
cosponsors
who have signed onto the bill. A cosponsor is a member of Congress who
has joined one or more other members in his/her chamber (i.e. House or
Senate) to sponsor a bill or amendment. The member who introduces the
bill is considered the sponsor. Members subsequently signing on are
called cosponsors. Any number of members may cosponsor a bill in the
House
or Senate. At
http://thomas.loc.gov you can also review a copy of each
bill’s content, determine its current status, the committee it has
been assigned to, and if your legislator is a sponsor or cosponsor of
it.
To determine what bills, amendments your representative has
sponsored, cosponsored, or dropped sponsorship on refer to
http://thomas.loc.gov/bss/d110/sponlst.html.
The key to increasing
cosponsorship on veteran related bills and subsequent passage into law
is
letting our representatives know of veteran’s feelings on issues.
At
the end of some listed bills is a web link that can be used to do
that. You can also reach his/her Washington via the Capital Operator
direct
at (866) 272-6622, (800) 828-0498, or (866) 340-9281 to express your
views. Otherwise, you can locate on
http://thomas.loc.gov who
your
representative is and his/her phone number, mailing address, or
email/website to communicate with a message or letter of your own
making. Refer to
http://www.thecapitol.net/FAQ/cong_schedule.html
for future times that
you can access your representatives on their home turf. [Source: RAO
Bulletin Attachment 13 Jul 08 ++]
Lt. James “EMO” Tichacek, USN (Ret)
Director, Retiree Assistance Office, U.S. Embassy Warden & IRS VITA
Baguio City RP
PSC 517 Box RCB, FPO AP 96517
Tel: (951) 238-1246 in U.S. or Cell: 0915-361-3503 in the Philippines.
Email:
raoemo@sbcglobal.net Web:
http://post_119_gulfport_ms.tripod.com/rao1.html
AL/AMVETS/DAV/FRA/NAUS/NCOA/MOAA/USDR/VFW/VVA/CG33/DD890/AD37 member
BULLETIN SUBSCRIPTION NOTES:
== To subscribe first add the above RAO email addee to your address
book and/or white list and then provide your full name plus either the
post/branch/chapter number of the fraternal military/government
organization you are currently affiliated with (if any) “AND/OR”
the city and
state/country you reside in so your addee can be properly positioned
in the directory for future recovery. Subscription is open to all
veterans, dependents, and military/veteran support organizations.
This
Bulletin was sent to 66,491 subscribers.
== To automatically change your email addee or remove yourself from
Bulletin distribution click the below or send a message which includes
your full name plus your old & new email.